3. Parsons Mead/Gardeners Road, Croydon - 52J - failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicles.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Parsons Mead/Gardeners Road, Croydon - 52J - failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicles.  (Read 3814 times)

0 Members and 124 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Parsons Mead/Gardeners Road, Croydon - 52J - failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicles.
« Reply #15 on: »
I advise Tribunal time. Just won a case re the lack of particularised vehicles.
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: Parsons Mead/Gardeners Road, Croydon - 52J - failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicles.
« Reply #16 on: »
Thank you Hippocrates.
What steps do I need to take now?
Do I reply and tell them this?
Can you help me through this or do I contact a company myself?
Logged
Re: Parsons Mead/Gardeners Road, Croydon - 52J - failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicles.
« Reply #17 on: »
Does the PCN show any readable images of the signs? I'll PM you later. Did you screenshot as suggested?

Homework:

Go to make a challenge. Screenshot the main page. In the box: select a reason, type in a statutory ground from the PCN and screenshot the result. There are 5 grounds.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2025, 01:45:16 pm by Hippocrates »
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: Parsons Mead/Gardeners Road, Croydon - 52J - failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicles.
« Reply #18 on: »
DNCed because of High Court ruling v Croydon.

Case No: 2250604908

Wish they had done this on Wednesday as I formulated quite a lengthy skeleton argument - well, for me!
« Last Edit: March 27, 2026, 12:49:22 am by Hippocrates »
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: Parsons Mead/Gardeners Road, Croydon - 52J - failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicles.
« Reply #19 on: »
Quote from: Hippocrates on March 26, 2026, 07:46:29 pm
DNCed because of High Court ruling v Croydon.

Case No: 2250604908

Wish they had done this on Wednesday as I formulated quite a lengthy skeleton argument - well, for me!

Actually not Do Not Contested because Croydon could not be bothered to inform the Tribunal, even though I did, but my missive was not uploaded.

"Certain vehicles" not good enough.
« Last Edit: April 09, 2026, 10:35:21 am by Hippocrates »
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: Parsons Mead/Gardeners Road, Croydon - 52J - failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicles.
« Reply #20 on: »
Logged
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »
  3. Parsons Mead/Gardeners Road, Croydon - 52J - failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicles.