Thank you both for all your help.
I am a bit nervous not coming back on this PCN at all - given that, like you say, either appealing and being rejected or waiting it out will both generate an NTO, would it ruin anything if I did send across an appeal at this stage?
I have drafted something below - if you could did have a moment to give your thoughts that would be most appreciated.
Appeal: PCN number #########
I am appealing the aforementioned PCN on the grounds that the location and contravention listed on the PCN are inaccurate and therefore the PCN is not legally enforceable.
Paragraph 2(c) of Schedule 2 of The Civil Enforcement of Road Traffic Contraventions (Approved Devices, Charging Guidelines and General Provisions) (England) Regulations 2022 states that the PCN must include “the grounds on which the civil enforcement officer issuing the notice believes that a penalty charge is payable.”
The location is listed as Hartfield Road, Wimbledon. This is location number 19141 on the ringo app.
The evidence taken by the enforcement office shows the car parked with the rear of the car against a wall, not along the side of a road. This is in Hartfield Road Car Park, location number 17303. Please see a photo of a different car in the same location taken during the day. Additionally, the Google maps location provided as evidence of the location of contravention is clearly the car park and not Hartfield road itself.
The PCN states that DY10 BGO was parked in Hartfield Road, and the contravention said it was parked in a car park without clearly displaying a valid pay and display ticket, or voucher, or parking clock. Firstly, given that the car park allows motorists to pay for parking on ringo, the contravention does not adequately capture that there is both the option to display a ticket or pay for parking virtually on the app. Secondly, as the car was not parked in Hartfield Road, but rather in Hartfield Road Car Park, with the two having completely different location names (in addition to location numbers on the app), the contravention is not adequately documented in order to make this PCN legally enforceable.
Given that no contravention occurred on Hartfield Road for the car with registration DY10 BGO, and that the contravention does not adequately detail the payment options available to motorists, please could you cancel the penalty.
Let me know your thoughts? I know your recommendation is to just wait it out, but how much damage will be done with the above appeal? The evidence was easily accessible through the Merton website, and like I say includes a Google location inside the car park. I will attach.
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]