Author Topic: London Borough of Southwark - Goldsmith Road  (Read 1226 times)

0 Members and 36 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: London Borough of Southwark - Goldsmith Road
« Reply #15 on: »
@sankofa well the location is here https://maps.app.goo.gl/UVTBFquno1TZHgqq9 and this is the CCTV:



There are two reasonable explanations here: you have not looked at the CCTV and your recollection of events is incorrect, or your appeal is based on a deliberate pack of lies.

There is also an unreasonable explanation i.e. that you honestly believe the CCTV supports your version of events.

I could not possibly comment on which one is more likely and readers of this thread will have to make their own minds up.

If you'd come to us we would have told you that the contravention is a clear case of banged-to-rightitis, but a technical appeal could have succeeded.
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Re: London Borough of Southwark - Goldsmith Road
« Reply #16 on: »
As incredulous as it may sound, I met a chap at the Tribunal recently who actually said to me that he had not looked at the video.
IF YOU RECEIVE A MOVING TRAFFIC PCN PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE MAKING A REPRESENTATION:

https://www.ftla.uk/the-flame-pit/moving-traffic-pcns-missing-mandatory-information-the-london-local-authorities-a/msg102639/#msg102639


How do we get more people to fight their PCNs?

https://www.ftla.uk/the-flame-pit/how-do-we-get-more-people-to-fight-their-pcns/msg41917/#msg41917

If you do not even make a challenge, you will surely join "The Mugged Club".

I am not omniscient. cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

My e mail address for councils:

J.BOND007@H.M.S.S.c/oVAUXHALLBRIDGE/LICENSEDTOEXPOSE.SCAMS.CO.UK

Last mission accomplished:

https://www.ftla.uk/the-flame-pit/southwark-to-r

Re: London Borough of Southwark - Goldsmith Road
« Reply #17 on: »
I cannot see much of a reputation here as there was no evidence of the 100's of cases won but lots of very unprofessional replies which do not bode well for forum that should be providing independent advice which should be balanced and objective.  No chance of that here, totally unprofessional personally attacking anyone who disagrees with your views and including information that is clearly inaccurate in your responses including responses which could amount to breaches of personal data.  In the final analysis the adjudicator was not in the car at the time,  I was.  I have seen the video footage which does not support your position that the car has not turned as it is only the last segment of the video. 
« Last Edit: January 20, 2025, 09:49:20 pm by sankofa »

Re: London Borough of Southwark - Goldsmith Road
« Reply #18 on: »
I cannot see much of a reputation here as there was no evidence of the 100's of cases won
Every noteworthy case is added to the "Key cases" tab of this spreadsheet, most of those cases are ours and most of them have been allowed, we add more each week. With your track record of 2 losses (this case and 2210528586) and zero wins, you're not really in a position to lecture us. In the other case learned adjudicator Teper said:

I considered the oral and written evidence in relation to the breakdown of the Appellant's vehicle and I find it to be weak and unconvincing, and I reject it.

Basically he called you a liar.

but lots of very unprofessional replies which do not bode well for forum that should be providing independent advice which should be balanced and objective.
Our advice is correct, we're not going to change the advice just because you don't like it.

No chance of that here, totally unprofessional personally attacking anyone who disagrees with your views and including information that is clearly inaccurate in your responses including responses which could amount to breaches of personal data.
Firstly you're the one who disagrees with a judicial tribunal, so your starting position is that you're on the back foot. As for the personal data thing, go on, sue me, I dare you.

In the final analysis the adjudicator was not in the car at the time,  I was.
If this particular adjudicator had been in the car she would have had to recuse herself. At the end of the day she reached a decision that she was entitled to on the basis of the evidence before her, if I'd been the adjudicator I would have made the same decision. We give honest and frank advice, we're not here to tell you what you want to hear.

I have seen the video footage which does not support your position that the car has not turned as it is only the last segment of the video.
A mere disagreement with the adjudicator is not a ground for a review.

Ultimately if you're so convinced that you're right and we're wrong (despite your two losses), I'm not really sure why you came here in the first place?
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order
Agree Agree x 1 View List