Author Topic: London Borough of Harrow - PCN Code 01 - Faded/Broken single yellow line - Cunningham Park  (Read 85 times)

cargy and 25 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hi all,

I would appreciate some advice regarding a PCN issued by the London Borough of Harrow.

PCN: IY01965421I
Contravention code 01 - Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours
Location: Cunningham Park (os lampp no 1)
Date: 20/05/2026

The main issue is the condition of the single yellow line. It is extremely faded to the point that behind the vehicle, there is effectively no visible yellow line at all, and the small remaining section in front of the vehicle is also faded/broken and was partially obscured by another parked car.

I was with my young child (redacted from photos) and dropping her off at a local cinema. After parking, we exited toward the adjacent street rather than walking in the direction of the upright sign. Because the yellow line was so badly faded and not clearly visible, it did not alert me to the presence of a timed parking restriction requiring reference to a nearby sign.

I have uploaded:

* CEO photos
* my own photos taken afterwards
* Google Street View screenshots/history
* front/back of the PCN
* a note left by a local resident stating the line “needs repainting”

CEO photos:
https://imgpile.com/p/CPFnW0c

My photos:
https://imgpile.com/p/FCOEVFY

GSV screenshots:
https://imgpile.com/p/H7WKDcP

Latest GSV (2 angles):

Apr 2025:
Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps.
Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps. · maps.app.goo.gl


Sept 2024:
Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps.
Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps. · maps.app.goo.gl


There is a nearby yellow time plate stating Mon-Sat 8am-6:30pm with an arrow pointing toward the location.

I have not yet received a notice to keeper, just the ticket attached to the windscreen.

Also, a resident left a handwritten note on the vehicle:

“Dear Owner, I’m a resident on this road. Please appeal + take a photo of the yellow line. It needs repainting! Good Luck!” - I have redacted the resident’s personal details, but this makes me think that this happens often at this location.

The GSV history also appears to show the line has been in poor condition for a considerable period of time.

Before I submit an informal challenge, I would appreciate views on whether the line condition is sufficiently poor to argue the restriction was not adequately conveyed / not substantially compliant.

Many thanks.
« Last Edit: May 21, 2026, 07:23:46 pm by GavelSmash »

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


I agree the line is probably not compliant and the termination of the double yellows emphasises that where you were looked unrestricted.

I take it the timeplate that was there at the start of the line has gone? 

The lines are very badly worn, almost non-existent, yet the double-yellows are as clear as a bell, so ordinarily, you would have a very strong case that the alleged contravention did not occur. However, if the sign, only feet away from your car is still present, your case is very much weaker, sorry to have to say it. The April 2025 GSV view shows it is present.

I can't see the council giving way on this, so you'd have to take them to London Tribunals with the full PCN penalty in play.


The OP's pictures show the timeplate at that end is not there now.

Council's pics show a timeplates some way down the road.

So good grounds for winning this.


Very good grounds, I'd say.

Thanks both. Yes, the timeplate is certainly missing since the GSV. It also explains why I didn't notice the yellow line as I didn't walk directly on the road but towards the nearest junction.

Does this sound like a good appeal to the Council?

Quote
Dear Sir or Madam,

Re: PCN IY01965421
Vehicle Registration: LN13PCZ

I challenge this Penalty Charge Notice on the grounds that the alleged contravention did not occur.

The restriction at the location was not adequately conveyed because the single yellow line was in an extremely poor state of repair and had deteriorated to the point where it was barely visible. In the area where my vehicle was parked, there is effectively no visible yellow line behind the vehicle and only a small remaining section in front. The condition of the road marking is evident from both the Civil Enforcement Officer's photographs and the photographs I took immediately after the PCN was issued.

The purpose of traffic signs and road markings is to adequately convey restrictions to motorists. In this case, the carriageway marking had deteriorated to such an extent that it failed to clearly indicate the presence of a single yellow line restriction.

Having reviewed historical Google Street View imagery, it appears that an upright timeplate previously existed much closer to the location where my vehicle was parked. However, my photographs show that this sign was no longer present on the date of the alleged contravention. The remaining timeplate relied upon by the council is located further along the road.

In circumstances where the single yellow line itself had almost entirely worn away, the absence of the nearest timeplate materially reduced the clarity of the restriction. The combination of a severely faded road marking and the removal of the nearby sign meant that the restriction was not adequately conveyed to motorists.

I have also obtained historical imagery showing that the yellow line had been in a poor and deteriorating condition for a considerable period before the date of the alleged contravention. This suggests that the condition of the marking was not a recent occurrence but had existed for some time.

In addition, an independent resident left a handwritten note on my vehicle stating:

"Dear Owner, I'm a resident on this road. Please appeal + take a photo of the yellow line. It needs repainting! Good Luck!"

While I appreciate that this note is not determinative, it is nevertheless notable that a local resident independently considered the road marking to be in need of repainting and sufficiently defective to warrant an appeal.

For the reasons set out above, I submit that the restriction was not adequately conveyed and therefore the alleged contravention did not occur. I respectfully request that the Penalty Charge Notice be cancelled.

Should the council not agree to cancel the PCN, please provide copies of any records relating to the inspection, maintenance, repair or replacement of the single yellow line and associated signage at this location during the 24 months preceding the date of the alleged contravention.

I look forward to your confirmation that the PCN has been cancelled.

Yours faithfully,



Yes, ram it up them ! However, don't expect a favourable reply, because London councils game the system ruthlessly to maximise income.
Just so you know, the sum involved, (incl TfL), for parking and traffic contraventions, is now well over £600 million per annum. A nice little earner.

I would reword upfront as you make it sound you knew about the yellow line.

---------

I challenge this Penalty Charge Notice on the grounds that the alleged contravention did not occur.

I was puzzled to get this PCN as I parked on what looks like unrestricted kerbside.

On reviewing possible grounds for the PCN it seems there is supposed to be a yellow line there but it was not apparent and has clearly deteriorated to the point where it was not compliant with conveying a restriction.

In the area where my vehicle was parked, there is effectively no visible yellow line behind the vehicle and only a small remaining section in front. The condition of the road marking is evident from both the Civil Enforcement Officer's photographs and the photographs I took immediately after the PCN was issued.