« Reply #31 on: September 18, 2025, 10:42:20 pm »
@cp8759 @mrmustard
Do paras 43 and 67 still apply?
We'd need a bit more context, how do you think they might apply to the current case?
@cp8759The juxtaposition of signs which are not allowed? The 953 and the legend? I can't find any other authorities which contradict the said statement at 43.
Judith Tracey at DFT used to be a contact. But, I don't know of any update. This was in pepipoo days. I can't find any exception in the most difficult to access TSRGD 2016.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2025, 10:44:34 pm by Hippocrates »

Logged
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.
If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".
cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"
There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.
To Socrates from "Hippocrates"