3. Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.  (Read 2641 times)

0 Members and 56 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
« Reply #15 on: »
For convenience (it would help if you could post the 2nd page the right way up!)

« Last Edit: July 23, 2025, 04:11:37 pm by John U.K. »
Logged
Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
« Reply #16 on: »
Well, the silly t(w)its have sent the wrong form for a start and have dodged the issues about their website. I say Tribunal time.
Logged
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
« Reply #17 on: »
@Hippocrates , haha glad you caught onto that.

What will be the next steps Re Tribunals? never done that before

heres the link to the second page the right way up: https://imgur.com/a/cOIR2dw


« Last Edit: July 24, 2025, 06:42:32 pm by John U.K. »
Logged
Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
« Reply #18 on: »
I'll PM you.
Logged
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
« Reply #19 on: »
I say go for it as per my e mail.
Logged
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
« Reply #20 on: »
To be filed imminently.
Logged
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
« Reply #21 on: »
I have just received a PCN from Lewisham Borough for the same offence, 52m on Dermody Road.

I cant remember driving down that road, but I was following the satnav.

The photos and video from Lewisham show I was following traffic down Dermody Road, and another car came the opposite way, so it appeared to be a normal main road with normal traffic flow. I suppose they all got fined?

I should have noticed the no car signs, but I wouldn't have expected them on a main road.

Is the PCN worth appealing?

Thanks
Logged
Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
« Reply #22 on: »
Quote from: davem66 on September 19, 2025, 05:34:45 pm
I have just received a PCN from Lewisham Borough for the same offence, 52m on Dermody Road.
I cant remember driving down that road, but I was following the satnav.
The photos and video from Lewisham show I was following traffic down Dermody Road, and another car came the opposite way, so it appeared to be a normal main road with normal traffic flow. I suppose they all got fined?
I should have noticed the no car signs, but I wouldn't have expected them on a main road.
Is the PCN worth appealing?
Thanks

As usual, for meaningful advice you will need to have a read of
https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/read-this-first-before-posting-your-case!-this-section-is-for-council-tfl-dartme/

and start your own thread by posting up there
all sides of the PCN (only redact yr name & address - leave all else in),
the video,
any council photos,
and
a GSV link to the location.

Logged
Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
« Reply #23 on: »
Thanks John

I did make another post on the topic and Hippocrates kindly replied: https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/pcn-contravention-52m-demody-rd-lewisham/msg90789/#msg90789.

Shall I add the extra material to this post?

Thanks Dave
Logged
Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
« Reply #24 on: »
Quote from: davem66 on September 22, 2025, 08:41:10 pm
Thanks John
I did make another post on the topic and Hippocrates kindly replied: https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/pcn-contravention-52m-demody-rd-lewisham/msg90789/#msg90789.
Shall I add the extra material to this post?

Thanks Dave

Please post material relating to your own case on your own thread.
Logged
Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
« Reply #25 on: »
ok will do
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »
  3. Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.