Author Topic: Lewisham, 12s - parked without a valid virtual permit, Lewisham Park/Chiddingstone House  (Read 530 times)

0 Members and 27 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hi,

Thanks in advanced for any advice!

I was visiting Lewisham Hospital yesterday for our 36 week scan (all good thankfully!), I parked on Lewisham Park in a bay that requires a permit, or payment via PayByPhone (see signage in image). We were running late so needed to head to the hospital whilst I processed the payment. 3 failed attempts at payment (with three different cards) through the PayByPhone app, 1 failed attempt by phone where their system just hung up on me, and finally successful payment on the web, meant that between arriving at 11:04 (timestamp from image of signage), it was only at 11:19 that a permit was paid for. Of course, during that time, the car was observed (11:07-11:17) and a PCN issued.

- Arrived 11:04 - timestamp on image of signage (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HRl_NZ7tKzWhLcLezJtNXP3AiYPZUwP6/view?usp=drive_link)

- 11:08 - 11:09 - 3 failed attempted at payment through app - timestamp of screenshots (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eZK8vHjuTWzy4QCxTTS4LMgif4DwvUKq/view?usp=drive_link, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1j-wPaEOxnjduxagGJ3GVCBSEKtFA0Rpz/view?usp=drive_link, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AGzUCJ4pEoKVn1F_tS0JuDl7lkypDXYU/view?usp=drive_link)

- 11:09 - 11:15 - failed attempt to pay by phone - time record of call of PayByPhone (the 0800 number at the bottom) (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YjI3xKgKLs8ED58aTbCxo0sbZIxAcR5Q/view?usp=drive_link)

- 11:17 - PCN issued (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NXCO9qIf6lNw0kBuDwNEW__Ng8hgrxAO/view?usp=drive_link)

- 11:19 - successful payment via the PayByPhone website - receipt (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HeYegsOy8jrVa_CF1kCyfuvg-gv5kAFQ/view?usp=drive_link)

I accept that during the time of observation, I didn't have a valid permit, however my argument is that for all of that time, I was making reasonable efforts to pay for the parking, and have evidence to that effect.

Any chance this stands up to appeal, or just accept and move on?

Thanks!

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Don't just cough-up !  You have a reasonable case for cancellation of the PCN. It is accepted by adjudicators that time has to be allowed for payment to be made to park. If this were not so, nobody could park legally at all !

Of course your time was somewhat extended, but you have a good reason for that. Reading between the lines of your narrative, it is clear that you were not by the car when tryng to make payment. It is never a good idea to walk away from the parked car when making a PbP payment, because if a CEO happens along, you cannot explain to him what you are trying to do.

Wait a bit to see what the others say, but prepare a draft based on your narrative, and post it here for review.

Thanks for the advice, much appreciated.

Current draft response, for feedback:

I am writing to request cancellation of PCN (XXXX) on the basis that time must be allowed to make payment for the required virtual permit.

The timeline of events relating to the PCN was as follows. Evidence of each stage is supplied, with timestamps.

- 11:04 - Arrived at parking location - see attachment 1 - “Parking Signage”
- 11:08 to 11:09 - 3 failed attempts to pay using the Pay by Phone app. 3 different payment methods attempted - see attachments 2, 3 and 4 - “App Payment Attempt 1-3”
- 11:09 to 11:15 - Failed attempt to pay over the phone to the Pay by Phone 0800 number. Pay by Phone system disconnected after 6 minutes - see attachment 5 - “Phone Payment Record”
- 11:19 - Successful payment made on Pay by Phone website - see attachment 6 - “Parking Receipt”

It is accepted by adjudicators that time must be allowed for payment to be made for parking. In this instance, that time period was longer than normal, however this was due to errors with the Pay by Phone systems, and not through any fault of mine. The evidence provided demonstrates that for the period of observation for the PCN (11:07-11:17), I was making all reasonable efforts possible to pay for parking, and in fact did so at the earliest opportunity.

You should say why you parked there - I presume you had to assist a heavily pregnant partner into the hospital and you could hardly hang about at the car waiting for service.

That is a very good, and very true, point!

It's an informal challenge at this stage and your draft is a bit confrontational - I would tone it down to be more about making every effort to register the session under the circumstances of the appointment and it was duly delivered according to the timeline.*

* A bit of humour can sometimes work wonders.
« Last Edit: April 23, 2025, 05:17:30 pm by stamfordman »

Thanks - a slightly softer approach below. What do you think? 

I am writing to request cancellation of PCN (XXXX) on the basis that time must be allowed to make payment for the required virtual permit. For context, I was parking in the given the location for an urgent hospital appointment for my heavily pregnant partner. Whilst we weren’t with the vehicle whilst making payment for the virtual permit, as it would have been unsafe for my partner to proceed to the hospital alone, we made every effort to do so in a timely manner, and it was duly delivered (no pun intended…) according to the timeline below.

- 11:04 - Arrived at parking location - see attachment 1 - “Parking Signage”
- 11:08 to 11:09 - 3 failed attempts to pay using the Pay by Phone app. 3 different payment methods attempted - see attachments 2, 3 and 4 - “App Payment Attempt 1-3”
- 11:09 to 11:15 - Failed attempt to pay over the phone to the Pay by Phone 0800 number. Pay by Phone system disconnected after 6 minutes - see attachment 5 - “Phone Payment Record”
- 11:19 - Successful payment made on Pay by Phone website - see attachment 6 - “Parking Receipt”

We feel we made all reasonable efforts available to secure the virtual permit, as quickly as possible, whilst maintaining the safety of those present. We accept that the period of observation for the PCN (11:07-11:17) falls within the timeline above, however we would hope that reasonable time to pay would be afforded, especially given the context.


That's much better. There are tribunal cases where this type of scenario at this length of time has been allowed should the council be unpleasant. A tough adjudicator could have sided with them on not using the phone line but you did try that too so I think you should see this off.
« Last Edit: April 23, 2025, 06:31:23 pm by stamfordman »

Hi,

Had a response from Lewisham on this, they find no grounds for cancellation, their response attached.

Whilst they accept the timeline given, and efforts made, their view is that no permit was in place whilst the CEO observed the vehicle (which I pointed out...).

It's frustrating that they say "Please be advised parking time must be sought immediately after parking", which I feel is exactly what I did. I accept I left the vehicle during this time, but they have given no appreciation to the context.

Is it worth pursuing this any further? If they are very unlikely not to change their minds I'd rather not risk the increase to £160.

Thanks!
« Last Edit: April 29, 2025, 02:51:57 pm by chris2209 »

You've left your name and address on the letter so I've captured the main body of the letter without this.

If it were me I'd go on with it - this is a pretty callous rejection given the circumstances. I think an adjudicator would allow this and the council may accept at formal stage if reminded of their duty to act fairly. But London penalties are now high so the stakes are higher.


Thanks for the response. So the process from here would be to not pay, wait for the Notice to Owner letter that they say they'll send? That will give me the chance to contest further? Thanks!

Hi,

I have now received the Notice to Owner for the PCN, as expected. However I have also been sent a second Notice to Owner for a different PCN, seemingly for the same alleged infraction.

I only received one actual ticket on the car (PCN ZY12707172), there was no ticket for this new PCN ZY12707161. The alleged time for the new PCN is 11:03 - 11:13, which is from the exact moment I arrived in the parking space, I took the image of the parking signage at 11:04 so not sure how this can be issued? Can they issue two PCN's simultaneously?

Please advise on how to appeal the original PCN, do I supply the same evidence as before or does this require anything additional?

Please also advise on how to handle the new Notice to Owner, given I was never issued the PCN in the first place, but obviously Lewisham believe that I was...

Thanks!

Notice to Owner for the originally issued PCN - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UviSa6-QtNws86NSyEs2dls2BtyDl10p/view?usp=drive_link

Notice to Owner for the new PCN - https://drive.google.com/file/d/16akIWMyNYwjSYnGP6BuNi5GJnuIfdJgk/view?usp=drive_link

Looks like clumsy fingers by the CEO as there is just 4 mins between the PCNs. There are no pics for the first one so I expect the CEO accidentally logged it and it shouldn't be a problem to get it cancelled by referencing the second one that was served on the car as pics show.

I'll have a think about reps for the rejected one.

Thanks stamfordman, would appreciate your help with response when you can.

Hi,

Just wondered if you'd been able to consider the response to the original PCN?

Thanks!