Forget the 14 days as they will reoffer the discount. It really is very important to put in sound representations.
Please put up your own draft first.
My main issues:
1. The sign is proscribed.
2. Their website fetters discretion re the grounds not allowed.
3. The representation page fetters to one ground only.
2 and 3 come under a collateral challenge.
Here is my draft representation. I don't have a lot to add other then what has been suggested here. Feel free everyone to make suggestions if you wish...
Dear Sir Madam,
I am writing to formally challenge the Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) number AF....... issued to myself for allegedly failing to comply with traffic restrictions on Cleveland Rd, Ilford IG1. I believe that this charge has been unfairly issued and wish to present my case for your consideration.
Firstly the sign indicating the restriction against traffic is not of the 'hinged' type that should be only visible during School Term Time. This type of sign has not received authorisation as suitable signage to traffic outside of the School zone, from the Department of Transport, rending the PCN here null and void.
Secondly when attempting to make an online representation against this PCN, the website fetters discretion with regards to the grounds allowed. The LB Redbridge website indicates which grounds will not be considered here, and a public body should not adopt such a rigid policy that prevents it from exercising discretion in individual cases.
Finally the online representation page fetters to only one ground only for representation. Again this is unfair and does not allow for proper consideration of the possible grounds for a PCN to be contested.
I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience.
Kind regards
Should I include any photos? I don't think they will reveal anything much...