Author Topic: LB of Brent - 53 - Kempe Rd j/w Chamberlayne Rd - Failing to comply with pedestrian zone (school).  (Read 160 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hippocrates

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1178
  • Karma: +16/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: The Cosmos.
    • View Profile
This is all great info and reinforces my belief that Brent's reps aren't worth the paper they're written on.
Do you mean Andrex?
There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends a hearing, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply in view of some adjudicators' lack of knowing what they ought to know through no fault of their own.

"Hippocrates"

ἔοικα γοῦν τούτου γε σμικρῷ τινι αὐτῷ τούτῳ σοφώτερος εἶναι, ὅτι ἃ μὴ οἶδα οὐδὲ οἴομαι εἰ

cp8759

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4485
  • Karma: +106/-4
    • View Profile
This is all great info and reinforces my belief that Brent's reps aren't worth the paper they're written on.
I don't think it's a problem confined to Brent.
I am not on the "motorists's side", nor am I on the "police/CPS/council's" side, I am simply in favour of the rule of law. Section 6 of the Interpretation Act 1978 applies to everything I post as it would apply to an Act of Parliament. I am a Conservative councillor, this means some people think I am "scum". I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor nor a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order

JimmyM

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Appeal was lodged with The Traffic Adjudicators last week and I received a hearing date of 4th July. Today Brent have emailed me stating they won't be contesting and will cancel the PCN. Many thanks to Incandescent and Mr Mustard.
Like Like x 1 View List

Hippocrates

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1178
  • Karma: +16/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: The Cosmos.
    • View Profile
Well done. Yet another example of a London council forcing motorists/soft targets to the Tribunal to obtain unjust enrichment to cover their appalling financial incompetence.

« Last Edit: June 10, 2024, 10:02:09 pm by Hippocrates »
There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends a hearing, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply in view of some adjudicators' lack of knowing what they ought to know through no fault of their own.

"Hippocrates"

ἔοικα γοῦν τούτου γε σμικρῷ τινι αὐτῷ τούτῳ σοφώτερος εἶναι, ὅτι ἃ μὴ οἶδα οὐδὲ οἴομαι εἰ