Author Topic: Islington PCN code 52 and subsequent notice of enforcement from CDER group  (Read 105 times)

0 Members and 53 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hi There,


Somewhat unusual situation, for us at least.



Earlier today, we received a notice of enforcement from CDER Group who by the looks are a debt collection agency  in the tune of £325. £250 fine and £75 fees. Ouch!



This due to a PCN that was issued back in 01/07/2025 on the grounds of code 52, failing to comply with prohibition on certain types of vehicle, e.g. LTN.



After much head scratching, my partner recalled that on that day on their way back from work, due to an accident, the police diverted traffic through Dove Road, an LTN street which must have resulted in the fine.



Now you might be asking, why so late with all this?



That's because we sold our place in Islington (no less to Islington council) and moved away to Barnet. We did setup mail forwarding and updated our drivers licenses etc. but forgot to update the log book. For whatever reason, we were completely unaware of this ticket, the PCN never materialized in post and here we are...



We logged onto Islington council's PNC portal, but can't find any photo or map evidence related to the PCN, but an entry exists.



We called CDER Group, but was met with a hostile and mildly threatening agent (usual tactic I guess) who said that we have to pay up as we didn't update the log book etc. Needless to say, we hung up.



We plan to call the council tomorrow to learn more... but in the meantime mulling on options.



Clearly, if traffic was being diverted by police, Islington council shouldn't have issued a PCN in the first place and there would be records of similar contravention at that time. Really unfortunate for us. But it was and it didn't make it to us eventually and was passed on to a debt collection agency.



Advice/help appreciated. I've attached a copy of the letter received today.










Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


You are missing the PCN, charge certificate and order for recovery, so either the mail redirection failed or the logbook wasn't correct and the letters went somewhere else.

We usually recommend paying at this stage as a bailiff visit adds £235. Paying doesn't remove your right to try an out of time declaration to get it reset.

What was date of move.

What dates for the redirection.

Check the name and address on logbook.

Hi There,

The date of move was 13th June. We setup redirection shortly afterwards, but I can’t find details on inbox, must have deleted the email somehow.

You are correct that the logbook weren’t correct as we forgot to update that (only drivers licenses).

Kind regards.


I meant did the logbook have the correct name and address of your previous address.

Yup, it did have correct previous address and names.
Thanks.

FYI called Islington just now.
They asked us to file a TEC and notify the debt collection agency. Apparently this is a very common thing!

FYI called Islington just now.
They asked us to file a TEC and notify the debt collection agency. Apparently this is a very common thing!
Common as in thousands of TEC submissions (Statutory Declarations or Witness Statements), per year.

I assumed in the context of the conversation, that people move, PCN gets sent to old address and next thing you know debt collection agency mail in your letterbox!

Common as in thousands of TEC submissions (Statutory Declarations or Witness Statements), per year.

As you don't seem to have updated the logbook you don't have much of a case. You could provide details of dates of mail redirection.

The out of time process is designed to cover those who get PCNs during the window of moving and updating the logbook, among other things such as no-fault address errors, but the law requires speedy logbook updating to where the registered keeper is. 
Wow Wow x 1 View List

As you don't seem to have updated the logbook you don't have much of a case. You could provide details of dates of mail redirection.

The out of time process is designed to cover those who get PCNs during the window of moving and updating the logbook, among other things such as no-fault address errors, but the law requires speedy logbook updating to where the registered keeper is.

Just to be clear - we're happy to pay the original PCN, but paying the debt company just feels wrong!
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 07:48:20 pm by maxxxpayne »

As you don't seem to have updated the logbook you don't have much of a case. You could provide details of dates of mail redirection.

The out of time process is designed to cover those who get PCNs during the window of moving and updating the logbook, among other things such as no-fault address errors, but the law requires speedy logbook updating to where the registered keeper is.

Since the contravention was less than two weeks from our date of move, surely we couldn't be expected to have updated the logbook?

Also, now we are slightly paranoid - what if we accidentally committed more contravention in the meantime and have more tickets in our name coming up? How do we check even?

If it's 2 weeks you have a very good case because you don't have to volunteer the tardy logbook status.

Needs careful wording - for professional help we recommend:
https://bailiffadviceonline.co.uk

If it's 2 weeks you have a very good case because you don't have to volunteer the tardy logbook status.

Needs careful wording - for professional help we recommend:
https://bailiffadviceonline.co.uk
+1

This is what I wrote:


Quote
We sold our flat to Islington Council on 13/06/2025 and moved to our current address on that date.

The alleged contravention occurred on 01/07/2025, less than two weeks after our move.
At that time, our vehicle logbook had not yet been updated with our new address.

We had arranged Royal Mail redirection from 07/06/2025. However, without our knowledge or any notification,
Royal Mail cancelled the redirection. We only became aware of this recently, which explains why we did not
receive any correspondence relating to this PCN.

During this period, we did receive other correspondence from Islington Council regarding our former
property, sent to our new address, which led us to believe that addressing was not an issue.

We have never previously failed to respond to or pay a PCN, and a number of PCNs paid or contested by
us are recorded on Islington Council’s PCN portal. Had we received the PCN or Notice to Owner, we would
have paid or made representations in the normal way.

We therefore respectfully request permission to file the statutory declaration out of time.