IMO, act upon their letter of authority and
appeal on their behalf. This has NOTHING to do with the contravention - so there's no need to mention it -but is purely procedural.
Dear Sir,
PCN **********
We write to you with regard to the above PCN which your records will show has been paid.
We have subsequently been advised that we could have made representations to the authority to which end we have now authorised ****** to make representations on our behalf for the purpose of relieving us of liability and giving you the opportunity to enforce against **** direct(see enclosed letter of authority) The council's financial position would be neutral in this matter because we paid at the discount which you could be able to recover from ***** in any event.
Our grounds of representation are:
(
c)in a case where the penalty charge notice has been served on the recipient on the basis that he was the owner of the vehicle concerned, that the recipient—
(i)never was the owner of the vehicle in question;
(ii)had ceased to be its owner before the detection date; or
(iii)became its owner after the detection date;
In our case (c)(ii) applies because on the detection date the vehicle was on long-term lease to ***** who therefore became the 'owner' for the purposes of Regulation 2(2) of The Bus Lane Contraventions (Penalty Charges, Adjudication and Enforcement) (England) Regulations 2005 by virtue of being the person by whom the vehicle was kept.
Their being the keeper is shown by the lease contract which is enclosed.
The council should refund the sum of *** as follows ********.
(for later if necessary:
https://www.londontribunals.gov.uk/sites/default/files/keycases/francis-v-wandsworth.pdf)