Free Traffic Legal Advice

The sign doesn't say park in marked bays only and it's likely they've disapplied the footway ban in the road, and on both sides the footway parking allowed sign covers your side as well as the other side.

So I think they are talking nonsense.

What is the car VRM.

There is no marked 2-up footway parking on Croydon's order map for this part of Haling Road. Only the school no stopping and yellow lines at the ends.

The first one shows you quite some way over the pavement so you need to be careful to be more like the second but it's just footway parking they are alleging regardless.

PCNs *** and ****

I refer to the above, my initial representations, the council's rejection letters dated ** and **, the Part 2 Sign Table of Schedule 7 to the Traffic Signs etc. Regulations and the enclosed GSV snapshot and my photos.

Both rejection letters gave the following as the  substantive reason for rejecting my representations:

You were issued.....

...contravention occurred.

From the evidence you will see that the council have been misinformed on this matter which raises serious issues regarding competence and financial liability as regards any historical misapplication of the law. My PCNs must be cancelled for the following reasons.

Approx. 20m from its junction with the other branch of Haling Road the council have placed traffic signs to the form prescribed in item 12 in the sign table(referred to as diagram 667)- see GSV and my photos. These carry the following meaning in law:

Vehicles may be parked partially on the verge or footway

If I may now refer you to your letters of rejection:

You MUST NOT park partially or wholly on the pavement in London...unless signs permit it.

And as regards this section of Haling Road, the signs placed by the council DO permit it. Where the council have gone wrong on this point is to believe that they may disregard the meaning of this sign and amend its effect by placing markings on the footway and then penalise drivers who park beyond or outside these markings.

If the council wish to restrict footway parking to marked areas then there is a separate sign prescribed for this purpose - see item 14 in the sign table(diagram 667.1) with the permitted variant of 'In marked bays only'. Absent these key words in the sign (and as regards this issue alone) motorists are permitted to park anywhere on the footway on either side of the road beyond the signs in situ until terminated by sign 16, diagram 667.2 which marks the end of the area.

If officers are in doubt on these points then I strongly recommend that they seek advice from legal officers. 

I would also bring to your attention that the PCNs did not arise because of one CEO's misapplication of the law but, as can be seen by the council's replies and the fact that works orders must have been raised by another department to erect the signs and mark the footway, because there's a systemic failure to understand the law. In fact whether the council have even formally disapplied the provisions of s15 GLC(GP)A 1974 and to what extent is still unknown.

To add to the above, I again refer you to the signs in Haling Road - see photos. You will see that these show both diagram 667 and 667.2 signs together. However, given that the road is one-way the meaning of the signs at the Haling Rd junction is unknown. Is diagram 667.2 supposed to mean the end of a permitted footway parking area preceding the sign, but if so why bother as footway parking is permitted after the sign or for traffic passing the wrong way along Haling Road?

I note from GSV that the incorrect signs and markings combination has been in existence since at least 2008 and I can only wonder how many unlawful penalties have been demanded since then(for parking outside the markings), or even earlier, and the scale of refunds for which the council will be liable.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/362/schedule/7/made

GSV snapshots
Your photos of the signs.

Just some thoughts.