0 Members and 958 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: MMV Redux on August 08, 2023, 10:29:45 amOP--getting the "bus lane closed" photos would be worthwhile.It wouldn't hurt.
OP--getting the "bus lane closed" photos would be worthwhile.
If there's no further comments in 2 / 3 days, bump the thread and I'll draft something for you.
Your video shows bus lane signs on the offside, which seems to address the main issue around adequacy.At this point the camera approval issue might be the strongest point, but we'll have to wait to confirm the make and model of the camera. The fact that the council has a recent certificate is not conclusive, as illustrated in the parking case of Imran Akhtar Ali v London Borough of Redbridge (2230298285, 05 August 2023).Another angle is that the wrong location is stated on the PCN:, the PCN says Maryon Park but the CCTV camera is on South Lake Roundabout, and the bus lane in question is on the part of Woolwich Road between Charlton Lane and South Lake Roundabout, which is not adjacent to Maryon Park at all.Give others a couple of days to comment but I'm minded to draft something based on the location issue, and while we wait for the informal rejection I should get confirmation of the camera make and model.
as i mentioned that I got 2 letters one dated 3/8/23 and the other 8/8/23 she replied that the my discount period ends on 19th.
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order
Quote from: j41sal on August 17, 2023, 12:31:10 pmas i mentioned that I got 2 letters one dated 3/8/23 and the other 8/8/23 she replied that the my discount period ends on 19th.I'm not sure you mentioned that here?Post the letter dated 8 August please.
Sorry in a bit of a rush but this will do:Dear Royal Borough of Greenwich,I contest liability because the alleged contravention did not occur. I have reviewed the video and it does not show my vehicle in a bus lane in the vicinity of Maryon Park, the footage appears to be of some other location. It follows that the contravention alleged on the PCN did not occur.Yours faithfully,
I believe that cp is cross-referencing certificates with actual named cameras.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1167140/approved-devices-granted-to-local-authorities.odsThey do have a new certificate since February. Only Bromley and Hackney do not have. The latter will sort it out shortly: their manufacturer has one but the council doesn't!The two cases DNCed by members of pepipoo were taken to the Tribunal and Greenwich claimed staff shortage. In fact, they had no certificate at all though their NORs said they did! This story will develop.