@Hippocrates , this is what i wrote:
"
Appeal:
I make this collateral challenge against the validity of the PCN as it is missing mandatory
information as provided at Para. 4 (8 ) (v) of
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukla/2003/3/section/4/enacted(v)that, if the penalty charge is not paid before the end of the 28 day period, an increased
charge may be payable.
Clearly, this refers to Para. 4 (8 ) (iii):
(iii)that the penalty charge must be paid before the end of the period of 28 days beginning
with the date of the notice;
Therefore, it follows that the statement: "If you fail to pay the Penalty Charge or make
representations before the end of a period of 28 days beginning with the date of service of
this notice an increased charge of £240 may be payable” adds to the lack of clarity by its
omission. Even on its own, whether the required information was included or not, it is also
arguable that it conflates the two periods using the word "or" which many would view as
being conjunctive. Furthermore, even if the statement were to be interpreted disjunctively,
there is still no clarity due to the missing information. So, it follows that it cannot possibly be
interpreted disjunctively"
