Author Topic: Enfield PCN Code 27 - dropped kerb  (Read 902 times)

0 Members and 243 Guests are viewing this topic.

Enfield PCN Code 27 - dropped kerb
« on: »
Yesterday morning at about 8.00am, I had parked my car next to a kerb on a residential road in Edmonton (N9), Enfield, without any parking restrictions. There were no houses around the section of the road where I parked. The road  was dark without any lights. The section where I parked was also partly flooded.

When I came back about two hours later, I could not believe that my car was no longer there. I didn't know what to do as this was not what I expected. Thinking that it might have been stolen, I even called the police. In the end, it turned out that the council had removed it by claiming that I had parked next to a dropped kerb. They demanded £65 for the PCN and £200 for the removal before giving the car back. I collected it straight away within 2 hours after parking there and had to pay £265 to get my car back.

In the photo attached, you can see that the section of the kerb where I parked was flooded and it was not obvious from any other signs around there that there was a dropped kerb there. The car pound staff claimed that there was a dropped kerb there in the flooded section of the kerb and that they had removed my car for that reason. How would I see it when the dropped kerb was covered with water?

I believe that this was a disproportionate action by the council and I am worried that this will be the norm from now on as those councils are very desperate for money and they are trying to find all sorts of ways to exploit motorists. In the past, they would put a PCN notice first and let us know if any contravention occurred, show proof etc and give us a chance to appeal. This time, within less than 2 hours after I parked the car, they removed it and I did not get any of the PCN details until I collected the car from the car pound.

I showed the attached photo with the flooded kerb to the car pound staff when I collected the car, but they said I needed to make the full payment of £265 first and then appeal within 28 days to claim my money back.

I would appreciate if you give me some advice before I submit my appeal.

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Re: Enfield PCN Code 27 - dropped kerb
« Reply #1 on: »
For meaningful advice, please to have a read of
https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/read-this-first-before-posting-your-case!-this-section-is-for-council-tfl-dartme/

and post here all sides of the unredacted PCN and of any other documents received at the pound, + a GSV link to the location.

Re: Enfield PCN Code 27 - dropped kerb
« Reply #2 on: »
If there is any good news at all in this case, it is that you have paid all there is to pay, so appealing the matter all the way to London Tribunals costs you nothing extra, and if you win, you get all the money back. First you have to submit reps to the council, and when inevitably rejected, you can register an appeal at London Tribunals.

Re: Enfield PCN Code 27 - dropped kerb
« Reply #3 on: »
The most important thing to do in this case is to put up all documents, both sides, and only cover up the name and address.

I often win towing cases because the motorist is not given proepr information at the car pound, as does CP8759

So please let us see everything so we can put killer representations together
I help you pro bono (for free). I now ask that a £40 donation is made to the North London Hospice before I take over your case. I have an 85% success rate across 2,000 PCNs but some PCNs can't be beaten and I will tell you if your case looks hopeless before asking you to donate.

Re: Enfield PCN Code 27 - dropped kerb
« Reply #4 on: »
I have to say, looking at your photo, that I don't think any appeal would succeed on the basis of "the dropped kerb wasn't visible to me", because the sloping kerbstones are clearly visible. However, this doesn't mean Game Over as Mr Mustard is expert in seeing the flaws in their PCN and management of the enforcement process.
Useful Useful x 1 View List

Re: Enfield PCN Code 27 - dropped kerb
« Reply #5 on: »
I am wondering what is on the opposite side of the road, a road we don't yet even know the name of, i.e. is one of the three statutory purposes engaged?
I help you pro bono (for free). I now ask that a £40 donation is made to the North London Hospice before I take over your case. I have an 85% success rate across 2,000 PCNs but some PCNs can't be beaten and I will tell you if your case looks hopeless before asking you to donate.

Re: Enfield PCN Code 27 - dropped kerb
« Reply #6 on: »
I am wondering what is on the opposite side of the road, a road we don't yet even know the name of, i.e. is one of the three statutory purposes engaged?
Indeed. So over to the OP to tell us more.

Re: Enfield PCN Code 27 - dropped kerb
« Reply #7 on: »
Hi guys

Thanks for your responses. I have answered your questions below and provided the list of photos with some explanation in the attached pdf document.

The name of the road Brookside Road N9 and the car was parked right next to a flooded kerb area where the dropped kerb section was not obvious.

I have checked the council's website to view their photo evidence. Based on my observations, my appeal grounds can be summarized as follows:

1) PCN time: In one of their own photos, the car removal truck is shown to be present right next to my car and reversing towards my car to remove it and the time is shown on the photo is 09.17hrs. Whereas the PCN issue time is shown as 09.19hrs i.e. two minutes later. This means that they started the car removal enforcement process well before issuing the PCN, giving no time for me to take my own photo evidence of the area where the car was parked or observe the settings before challenging their decision. In the attached document, you will see their photos showing these times (one of the photos shows the car removal truck right next to my grey VW, reversing towards it but there is no PCN on my car at all - this photo of theirs had been taken at 09.17hrs. The other copied PCN document shows their PCN time, which had been issued at 09.19hrs i.e. two minutes later.) This means that they had decided to remove my car well before issuing the PCN.

2) The same photo also shows that the part of the kerb where I parked had been flooded, making it difficult to see whether there was a dropped kerb there.


3) Uneven kerb surface right behind my parked car - it is not known whether there are two dropped kerbs next to one other or they did it to confuse motorists about where the dropped kerb starts and finishes. In two other photos in the document attached, you can see part of the kerb behind my parked car which looks very different with a slightly pinkish colour and some slightly dropped kerb surface ending towards the carriageway. I felt like the dropped kerb was behind me rather than next to me hidden in the flooded area.

4) No PCN documents were given until after the payment was made: Only after I made the £265 payment, they gave the PCN document along with the payment receipts and the document explaining how to challenge. When I collected the car, all I could see was an empty plastic PCN envelop on the car and nothing in it. It looks like they put it on the car for the sake of doing so.

I have attached the google view of the road and marked the space where the incident occurred to help you understand the road layout. I will send the other photos and documents, but I can only upload up to 4 photos it says, so I may have to send them in another way.

I hope this answers your questions. Let me know if you have any other questions.

Thanks for your assistance again.


[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Re: Enfield PCN Code 27 - dropped kerb
« Reply #8 on: »
If you read the read this sticky it tells you how to post pics etc.

The PCN was given to you at the pound. The contravention is deemed in the category for instant removal.

We need to see all the paperwork and the council's pics.

There are opposite dropped footways although the one opposite is on a large paved area.

It's a predatory tow as this is a backstreet and the crossing is mid-way and doesn't lead to another path. It isn't where you'd be looking out for a crossing really. The dropped kerbs are probably there for council mowers.



https://www.google.com/maps/@51.6186766,-0.0563611,3a,89.9y,145.88h,75.51t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sK00CSz-rxXHLc0h74y-OyA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D14.494222618108793%26panoid%3DK00CSz-rxXHLc0h74y-OyA%26yaw%3D145.881077273143!7i13312!8i6656?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI0MTIwNC4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

« Last Edit: December 07, 2024, 04:55:11 pm by stamfordman »

Re: Enfield PCN Code 27 - dropped kerb
« Reply #9 on: »
and a 'traffic warden' is usually based in the tow truck
I help you pro bono (for free). I now ask that a £40 donation is made to the North London Hospice before I take over your case. I have an 85% success rate across 2,000 PCNs but some PCNs can't be beaten and I will tell you if your case looks hopeless before asking you to donate.

Re: Enfield PCN Code 27 - dropped kerb
« Reply #10 on: »
Quote
The dropped kerbs are probably there for council mowers.
Or people on scooters
https://maps.app.goo.gl/kibxexVk9iL7G1oy8

Re: Enfield PCN Code 27 - dropped kerb
« Reply #11 on: »
OP, I suggest you compose your thoughts and approach differently.

There are 3 separate but dependent issues:
1. Was the car in contravention and could a PCN be issued;
2. Was the car removed lawfully, including in accordance with the council's published policy?
3. Procedural matters at the pound.

1. Yes and yes IMO. No point dancing around this. You were parked by a dropped footway which is a statutory prohibition if placed for the purposes specified in the Act. As there's a matching dropped footway immediately opposite IMO there's nothing to stop an adjudicator finding as a fact that its purpose is to assist pedestrians crossing the carriageway. That you claim that it was masked by water won't save you because it's not supported by the council's photos which you've posted.

2. Lawful removal? The OBCEO(onboard CEO cannot issue the PCN, their role is to determine whether a vehicle to which a PCN has been served may be removed/moved and oversee this removal in line with the council's policy*). There must be a PCN affixed to the car before removal can be considered.

3. Procedural matters at the pound.  You were not given the PCN and other docs until payment for the vehicle's release had been made. Nothing untoward in this IMO.

*- council's policy. Have you seen this? The council is empowered to remove vehicles but must determine and publish its policy before doing so and officers with the 'enforcement authority' hat must comply with this.

As you've blanked your VRM we cannot see the council's photos.

Re: Enfield PCN Code 27 - dropped kerb
« Reply #12 on: »
VRM is EX64XXP looking at the pic, can be seen "through" the blanking

Re: Enfield PCN Code 27 - dropped kerb
« Reply #13 on: »
Thanks guys for your responses. I have put in the attached document all the photos shown on the council's appeal website in a chronological order. There are only 6 photos on their website and no other evidence or any other explanation had been provided about the PCN.

I have also copied the documents given at the car pound, which are: a PCN (both sides of it have been copied as you requested), a payment receipt form filled in by the car pound staff, and the appeal form given by them.

I have put my own photo showing the kerb under water where I parked and the uneven surface of the kerb behind my parked car, which had a lowered end too, bringing more confusion about where the actual dropped kerb started and finished.

I looked for the council's rule book about their car towing rules, but could not find it.

I hope these details in the attached document will be sufficient for you. These are the only photos and documents that I have been provided by the council.

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Re: Enfield PCN Code 27 - dropped kerb
« Reply #14 on: »
You have the reasonable point about the earlier conditions when you parked.

We don't have a vehicle removal policy by Enfield but it's likely to be the same as others which is that code 27 is in the highest category of priority for removal and also instant with no waiting.

This predatory tow we usually see with Newham, which tours a removal truck around looking for contraventions. You can argue in this location it is disproportionate but the tribunal is bound by the law not mitigation. But it's point to make.

I'd say the conditions at parking are your best bet but others will check the documentation.

In any case you have reps and then an appeal with no further cost.

« Last Edit: December 07, 2024, 11:43:38 pm by stamfordman »