Hello all.
Just to update that sadly I lost the tribunal. Please see the adjudicator's findings below:
"The Appellant is appealing a Penalty Charge Notice issued in respect of parking on a taxi rank at the location.
The Enforcement Authority relies upon the contemporaneous evidence of the Civil Enforcement Officer, a copy of the PCN, a copy of the relevant legislation and a location map.
The Appellant contends that the road markings at the location were not statutorily compliant. It is also contended that Blue Badge parking was permitted at the location.
I have carefully considered all the evidence in this matter, including the appellant’s oral evidence which I found to be credible and cogent.
The Council contends that the vehicle was parked in a bay which at the relevant time, was reserved for taxis only. The vehicle was observed to be parked in very close proximity to the relevant signage, which sets out three separate restrictions: taxis only between 6pm and 8am, Friday and Saturday; Goods vehicles only loading from Monday to Saturday 8am to 6pm, and all vehicle parking at other times. The day in question was a Saturday.
The Appellant contends that the carriageway markings at the location were not statutorily compliant. They contend that, pursuant to item 8, Part 4 of Schedule 7 to the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016, a broad 200 millimetre yellow line is missing from the road markings on Fore Street. However, this is a shared use bay and not a bay only used for taxis, ambulances or police vehicles where stopping by other vehicles is prohibited. The bay in question is a multi-use bay. There is therefore no statutory requirement for a yellow line at the edge of the carriageway.
The appellant has told me that they were the driver on the relevant occasion, and had been looking for a place to park. They saw the parking bay and has been frank in telling me that they simply did not notice the signage just ahead of the vehicle. They displayed their Blue Badge prior to leaving the vehicle and I accept that they genuinely believed that they could legitimately park there.
The sign itself is subdivided into three separate panels. The upper panel, setting out the “taxi only” restriction is prominent and unobscured and I find that it clearly set out the relevant restrictions. Whilst I accept that he did not see it, it was nonetheless there to be seen, in close proximity to the vehicle.
The EA contends that the Blue Badge displayed could not be relied upon by the appellant as the bay was, at the relevant time, a “taxi only” bay. The appellant contends that he should have been able to rely upon his Blue Badge by virtue of Regulation 8 of SI 683 of the Local Authorities Traffic Orders (Exemptions for Disabled Persons) (England) Regulations 2000.
The Local Authorities’ Traffic Orders (Exemptions for Disabled Persons)(England) Regulations 2000 set out a number of exemptions to parking contraventions for Blue Badge holders at Articles 6-9. Regulation 8 does not appear to be applicable in this case, as that regulation appears to deal with prohibitions on waiting in a road at all times of day or during specified periods i.e. it relates to waiting on either double or single yellow lines. Regulation 8 requires an exemption to be included in traffic orders which provide for restrictions indicated by yellow lines. I do not find that reliance upon this Regulation can be extended to what is a “taxis only” bay during the relevant hours. The 2023 order sets out a number of exemptions to the restriction. However, they do not include an exemption for Blue Badge parking.
I therefore find that the appellant’s Blue Badge may not be relied upon whilst a “taxis only” restriction is in force and the display of the Badge did not permit him to park as he did.
I am satisfied to the requisite standard that a contravention has taken place and that no statutory ground of appeal/exemption has been established. Accordingly I must refuse this appeal."
I appreciate everyone's help and it was definitely worth a go!