Author Topic: Ealing Council 53J – Failing to Comply – Order for Recovery Stage  (Read 468 times)

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hello,

I think I've followed the guidance in the pinned post correctly so please let me know if I've missed anything.


Firstly, here is the PCN and Street View link:




https://maps.app.goo.gl/wusRVRUdqm8RTN747


The Schools Streets scheme started on 14 October 2024 and I live on an adjacent road. Only those who live on a School Street are allowed to have permits.

Simple story: I was home earlier than usual, it was a little darker too so felt later in the day, and I turned in by mistake. I very quickly realised my error and didn't go beyond the first house, then reversed out of the road. When a PCN didn't arrive, I assumed I hadn't triggered the camera but then a Charge Certificate did! Despite requesting the video footage days ago, it's still unavailable for me to view.

I waited for the Order of Recovery to arrive and have had the Statutory Declaration witnessed and will send it to TEC shortly.

I'd be grateful for any advice you have. I'm thinking that the best outcome may be it reverting to a reduced fine?

Thanks in advance.

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Quote
When a PCN didn't arrive,

But you have a PCN, dated 6/1/25 ??

Please post the CC and the Order for Recovery.

Is your address on your V5 correct in every particular and is the address on the documents received from Ealing an exact match?
Is the car leased?

Sorry for the confusion, I meant to upload the other letters too.






The address is an exact match and the car is not leased. I assume the original PCN just went missing in the post.

Date of OfR - 11 May 2025

'You must within 21 days of the date on the envelope..

Pay or

Submit a Statutory Declaration'

IMO, you're too late to submit 'in time'. You may still submit but the authority may oppose and you should give reasons for lateness.

We know so little* that it's difficult to advise.

*- but we do know that the PCN was also served late if the car was not hired and would like to know how you have managed to post a PCN which went astray in the post.

 



*- but we do know that the PCN was also served late if the car was not hired and would like to know how you have managed to post a PCN which went astray in the post.


+1

I've clearly made a right hash of explaining myself. Sorry for making this difficult.

When I received the Charge Certificate, I contacted TEC and once the debt was registered, I mistakenly sent them the wrong form.

When they informed me of my error, they said I had to send them the PE3 form by 13/06 at the latest. I sent the form to them earlier today.

The PCN was sent along with the Order of Recovery. I kept the envelope and there isn't a date on it.

Please let me know what further details you need and I will do my best to supply the answers. Thanks
« Last Edit: June 08, 2025, 11:01:01 pm by FrazzledHead »

Hello all,

I've received a letter from TEC stating that they accept my witness statement and I have now received a new PCN from Ealing Council. I've also included the letter I received from Ealing Council in relation to this.

Does anyone see any issues with it or is this a straight forward case of paying at the reduced rate?

Despite several requests to view the footage, I haven't been able to. I've just submitted another request and will post the footage as soon as I can.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks.




ujhu

« Last Edit: July 04, 2025, 01:09:02 am by FrazzledHead »

Well, do you think it's a fair cop or not ?
Apart from paying, you can also submit representations against the PCN. Of course, as it's a PCN dated 25th June 2025, (their letter referred to a Notice to Owner), you still have the option to pay the discounted amount.

Penalty exceeded the amount applicable in the circumstances of the case.

The alleged contravention occurred on 9 December 2024. The council subsequently issued a Penalty Charge Notice on 9 January 2025 which was deemed served on Monday 13 January, an elapsed period for the purposes of the Act of 36 days.

The Act prohibits an authority serving a PCN any time after the period of 28 days -s6(1) of the London Local Authorities and Transport for London Act 2003 refers.

I was prevented from making representations to the authority on these grounds(which would have resulted in the cancellation of the PCN) by virtue of the PCN not being served. I submit that as the initial PCN was invalid, then the authority are similarly prevented from pursuing the penalty by issuing a further PCN as the strict time limit of 28 days is not disapplied simply because of their failure to serve the first PCN in time.

The PCN must be cancelled.


Is my reading.

Well, do you think it's a fair cop or not ?
Apart from paying, you can also submit representations against the PCN. Of course, as it's a PCN dated 25th June 2025, (their letter referred to a Notice to Owner), you still have the option to pay the discounted amount.

I do not think it's a fair cop at all! I still haven't seen the footage but have put in yet another request and screengrabbed the request this time. At the very least, it was a minor infringement, from which I reversed out at the earliest opportunity. From what I can tell from the photo, I didn't go beyond the first house in that road. I think reps will be the way I go but I need to clarify some details first.

Re: Ealing Council 53J – Failing to Comply – Order for Recovery Stage
« Reply #10 on: »
Penalty exceeded the amount applicable in the circumstances of the case.

The alleged contravention occurred on 9 December 2024. The council subsequently issued a Penalty Charge Notice on 9 January 2025 which was deemed served on Monday 13 January, an elapsed period for the purposes of the Act of 36 days.

The Act prohibits an authority serving a PCN any time after the period of 28 days -s6(1) of the London Local Authorities and Transport for London Act 2003 refers.

I was prevented from making representations to the authority on these grounds(which would have resulted in the cancellation of the PCN) by virtue of the PCN not being served. I submit that as the initial PCN was invalid, then the authority are similarly prevented from pursuing the penalty by issuing a further PCN as the strict time limit of 28 days is not disapplied simply because of their failure to serve the first PCN in time.

The PCN must be cancelled.


Is my reading.

Thank you very much for your advice, I really appreciate it. Sorry but I just wanted to check a couple of details, which I know will seem obvious to you.

The Council actually issued the PCN on 8 January, but that's still 35 days, so well over the strict limit of 28 days. However, do they get extra time because of the public holidays? Your count of 35 days suggests not but I just wanted to double check.

Do you mind if I quote verbatim your words in my representation letter? Also, is it worth including the fact that despite several requests, I still haven't received the footage? I'm thinking it's a moot point because of the above grounds.

Re: Ealing Council 53J – Failing to Comply – Order for Recovery Stage
« Reply #11 on: »
If it's 8th(the image is a tad blurred) then the elapsed period is 33 days:

Limitation on service of penalty charge notice
(1)Subject to the provisions of this section, no penalty charge notice may be served under this Act after the expiry of the period of 28 days beginning with the date on which the alleged contravention or failure to comply occurred.


Date of contravention  - 9 Dec.
Date PCN issued - 8 Jan.
Date deemed served - 10 Jan.
Elapsed period(taking 9 Dec. as day 1) - 33.

This is a statutory defence, your other point isn't. As far as I'm aware it's a collateral challenge under public law grounds.

Re: Ealing Council 53J – Failing to Comply – Order for Recovery Stage
« Reply #12 on: »
Thanks H C Andersen, that's very clear and I understand what you're saying.

I will makes reps as you've outlined and report back when I hear from the council.