Author Topic: 52J - Failing to Comply with a Prohibition on certain types of vehicles (Croydon Council - Dalmally Road)  (Read 2847 times)

0 Members and 1196 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hello

My wife receieved a PCN from Croydon Council on 15/11/23, whilst taking our 18 year old son for a driving practice drivng lesson ahead of his test in a couple of months.

52J - Failing to Comply with a Prohibition on certain types of vehicles.

This happened on Dalmally Road at the junction with Blackhorse Lane in Croydon (Addsicombe).

I appealed against the PCN on 16/11/23 and subsequently have recieved a Notice of Rejection on 09/11/23

Should this be appealed further (to the Adjudiator) or should the fine be paid?

I attach the original PCN, my intial appeal and the Rejection Notice from Croydon Council.

  :) All and any advice/guidance gratefully accepted, thank you for taking the time to read this  :)

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook



Here are your notices





And here your challenge



And your photos
 Which direction was the car travelling? Left or right into Dalmally Road from Blackhorse Lane, or the reverse?
I suspect that the contravention may be proved, but see what the experts have to say about the 'small print'.











the car was travelling along Dalmally Road on to Blackhorse Lane.

THe key bit of info here is the intention to install warning signs, (but not doing so before the LTN was established,  because this indicates the inadequacy of the signage.  If you're prepared to stand your ground and risk the full PCN penalty, take them to adjudication. However, a win is not guaranteed, I'm afraid.  Apart from the missing warnings, you look bang-to-rights, frankly.

THe key bit of info here is the intention to install warning signs, (but not doing so before the LTN was established,  because this indicates the inadequacy of the signage.  If you're prepared to stand your ground and risk the full PCN penalty, take them to adjudication. However, a win is not guaranteed, I'm afraid.  Apart from the missing warnings, you look bang-to-rights, frankly.

I just came across some other information which might be relevant.  Since the PCN does not has an address where I can send payment by post, does this not make it invalid or a reason to contest it?

Nope. Cannot read most  of the images.  The PCN does not specify what vehicles.
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"