The PCN is required to say what you did wrong and it doesn't say what class should be there.
This case was won on this basis.
---------
2160271291
This PCN was issued for the alleged contravention of being parked in a
parking place or area not designated for that class of vehicle. The PCN
was issued at 12.56pm on 27 April 2016 and the location was Lenelby
Road.
The Schedule to The Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions
(England) General Regulations 2007 sets out the contents required by the
Regulations for a valid PCN served under Regulation 9.
Among other things, the PCN is required to state the grounds on which the
enforcement authority believes that the penalty charge is payable. Those
grounds must be expressed in terms that allow the recipient of the PCN to
properly understand the nature of the alleged contravention.
The Council say that the place in which Mrs Harding's vehicle was parked
was a goods vehicle only loading bay. In other words, the bay was
designated for goods vehicles only. This is not, however, clear on the face
of the PCN which states simply that the vehicle was parked in a place not
designated for that class of vehicle.
A motorist reading the PCN would not understand from the wording the
nature of the alleged contravention because there is nothing to explain the
class of vehicle for which the parking place was designated. The PCN
needs to identify, whether by wording or images, that the class of vehicle
for which the bay is designated is goods vehicles only.
I therefore find that the PCN was invalid and the appeal is allowed for that
reason.