Author Topic: Contravention 165 - Disabled Bay  (Read 171 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Contravention 165 - Disabled Bay
« Reply #15 on: »
I've sent my formal appeal using the advice given, will keep you guys posted
« Last Edit: July 16, 2026, 12:02:33 am by LondonTraveller84 »

Re: Contravention 165 - Disabled Bay
« Reply #16 on: »
Hi Guys,

Received a NOR, seems like they've ignored the TMO and their focus is that the warden did not see us loading hence the ticket, even though we've provided evidence showing the table coupled with the fact we even went to the warden shocked, to let him know the situation and that we had to go get the table.

Not sure what else i can add to my case for adjudication, other than hihglight why the warden would not have seen us, but that this doesn't discount the fact that we were still loading.

I understand with a loading bay you may have to remain with the car at all times or close, so your visible to the warden, I see no such requirements in the TMO for loading/unloading on a disabled bay.


Attached NOR:
https://ibb.co/wNxztf5F
https://ibb.co/hFSYFGwN
https://ibb.co/QjFSXsr1


Re: Contravention 165 - Disabled Bay
« Reply #17 on: »
God, what tosh !  However, they don't say you cannot load in these bays, but must establish a exemption. The CEO saw you at the time for heavens sake, and you told him you were loading !!

There is no requirement in law or the regulations for loading to be attended all the time. But of course, this is the usual Fob-Off letter we see so often. If it were me, I'd be taking them to London Tribunals, if the TMO permits loading in these bays for disabled permit holders. Of course if it doesn't, pay the discount.
Like Like x 1 View List

Re: Contravention 165 - Disabled Bay
« Reply #18 on: »
If the TMO permits loading in these bays for disabled permit holders

The exemption in the TMO from my understanding is that a any vehicle can load/unload without having a disabled permit or in fact any permit.

I do not have a disabled permit holder, only a permit for that zone, that would allow the car to be parked anywhere on that road, expect a disabled resident bay.,

Re: Contravention 165 - Disabled Bay
« Reply #19 on: »
It's a nonsensical rejection as it acknowledges your reps but then ignores the claimed exemption. They imply but do not state it doesn't apply but that isn't good enough.

I think you are in solid grounds going for the appeal but wait for others.
Like Like x 1 View List

Re: Contravention 165 - Disabled Bay
« Reply #20 on: »
If the TMO permits loading in these bays for disabled permit holders

The exemption in the TMO from my understanding is that a any vehicle can load/unload without having a disabled permit or in fact any permit.

I do not have a disabled permit holder, only a permit for that zone, that would allow the car to be parked anywhere on that road, expect a disabled resident bay.,
Sorry, just re-read my text and what I meant was loading by anyone in bays for disabled permit holders !
Like Like x 1 View List

Re: Contravention 165 - Disabled Bay
« Reply #21 on: »
Their letter isn't just a Fob-Off, but a devious way to reject representations when they know full-well that the exemption applies.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Re: Contravention 165 - Disabled Bay
« Reply #22 on: »
As in Britain's Got Talent, and it's register an appeal from me!