Free Traffic Legal Advice

Salutations to all from me.

and "When it rains...it pours!!!" springs to mind.

Have received another PCN, this time for the above-mentioned alleged contravention.  Details are:

PCN

CCTV footage

GSV


Will be submitting initial reps along the following lines:

1) using @Hippocrates argument of missing mandatory language pertaining to "...Para. 4 (8 ) (v) of...."
2) tree foliage on the nearside along with height of the signs did not give a clear and unrestricted view of the said signs;
3) no advance warning signs with the enforced times, just the following (see pic).  Is this a valid [regulatory] argument?

Can't use the "Term-time only" get-out clause anymore as most (not all!!) have been taped over.

Thoughts/opinions please before I shoot it off to Redbridge council.

Regards - NTIAEP

As expected, Redbridge rejected my reps.....so London Tribunals hearing in the pipeline.