Okay thanks, so worth appealing on the basis of misleading signage? Have drafted the below, please let me know feedback:
I challenge this PCN on the basis that the restriction was not adequately conveyed by the signage at the location.
The Council’s own photographs show a number of different restrictions displayed on signage in close proximity, including motorcycle restrictions, resident permit restrictions and payment information. The sign relied upon is not positioned in a way that clearly identifies the exact bay to which it applies.
For bays with different restrictions, clear signing normally requires the restriction for each bay to be unmistakable — for example, signs mounted together with clear arrows or positioning indicating which individual bay or section they govern. In this case, the signage arrangement is ambiguous and could reasonably mislead a motorist.
Under Regulation 18 of the Local Authorities’ Traffic Orders (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996, the Council has a duty to ensure that restrictions are adequately indicated. The evidence provided does not demonstrate that the resident permit restriction was clearly conveyed for the precise location where the vehicle was parked.
I therefore request that the PCN is cancelled.
