I have messaged the OP. Please give me your wife's number to stop her nagging you about paying! I will not lose this case. If I do, I will pay half. And then she can take me out for dinner at McDonalds. Councils play upon such fear! ULEZ has nowt to do with this!
I can't be bothered anymore with this thread if people do not listen. The offer still stands.
cp8759, MrMustard and I are fondly described as "The Three Musketeers" by one member of staff at the Tribunal. If you wish for the guillotine, then pay. I would PM both of them if you do not trust me.
I have just e mailed them.
Ha, I replied to your post asking about the wording of my appeal, I will repost here;
----------------
So I'm 100% clear, I challenge stating (my changes in bold);
Dear Camden
Ref: PCN VRM
As the owner of the registered vehicle, I was not driving at the time in question. My husband was driving, and he will be representing me from this point forward.I challenge the PCN as follows:
1. There is no adequate signage in place or, indeed, shown in the video.
2. There is no exact location stated on the PCN.
3. I put you to strict proof that the camera used to capture the alleged contravention is approved by the VCA. Unless you can do so, the evidence is inadmissible at the Tribunal according to para. 7(2) of Schedule I of the London Local Authorities act 1996 (as amended)
4. The core Order (The Camden (Bus Lanes) (Consolidation) Traffic Order 2012)specifies an access exemption at Art 5.1.1. I was in the "bus lane only to such extent and for so long as necessary to enter or exit a side road" as demonstrated by your camera evidence.In light of the above, the PCN must be cancelled.
Yours
My name not the wife's 
Address
----------------
Appreciate the offer, BTW I've not had a message?
