I have all the paperwork to do with this bus lane, the cameras and the number of bus lanes actually on the said road. MrMustard knows the lack of signage well. Fun time!
The Mrs should do the challenge. She can always authorise you at this stage or any stage in the process.
Anyway, as I promise all my clients, if I lose a bus lane case, I pay half. I got 5 out of 7 cancelled two weeks ago against Lambeth and more to follow because the infamous council say formal represenatations were not made in time! Costs application filed today. 2240132030
So I'm 100% clear, I challenge stating (my changes in bold);
Dear Camden
Ref: PCN VRM
As the owner of the registered vehicle, I was not driving at the time in question. My husband was driving, and he will be representing me from this point forward.I challenge the PCN as follows:
1. There is no adequate signage in place or, indeed, shown in the video.
2. There is no exact location stated on the PCN.
3. I put you to strict proof that the camera used to capture the alleged contravention is approved by the VCA. Unless you can do so, the evidence is inadmissible at the Tribunal according to para. 7(2) of Schedule I of the London Local Authorities act 1996 (as amended)
4. The core Order (The Camden (Bus Lanes) (Consolidation) Traffic Order 2012)specifies an access exemption at Art 5.1.1. I was in the "bus lane only to such extent and for so long as necessary to enter or exit a side road" as demonstrated by your camera evidence.
In light of the above, the PCN must be cancelled.
Yours
My name not the wife's 
Address
Thanks
