Author Topic: Lincolnshire County council PCN (40) Not displaying badge in a valid manner Lumley Road Skegne  (Read 1436 times)

0 Members and 111 Guests are viewing this topic.

Next Steps
View the evidence below
You are able to add comments should you wish.
Select your decision option
If you do not select either option by 17/06/2025 your case will go to the adjudicator to decide
.

LCC has uploaded their evidence which in addition to the other items already seen has three additional items  their TRO location of vehicle and a TRO/Schedule

https://tro.trafficpenaltytribunal.gov.uk/TRO/Lincolnshire/QJ01.pdf

https://tpt-production-eu-west-2.s3-eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/production/uploads/attachment/source/d11e1bb3-2f7c-4608-a3c4-e61b216e9d48/SKEGNESS%20-%20TF565630.pdf?X-Amz-Expires=600&X-Amz-Date=20250610T144823Z&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASYVCW657A65E72EO/20250610/eu-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=de5d975b964754bcaf34015d261fe23e52550e24d091a9930c49d126c174cd70[/url

[url=https://imgur.com/a/vkFMaqe]https://imgur.com/a/vkFMaqe


I look forward to advice as to the way forward with this PCN please

I refer the adjudicator to section 107 of the authority's Traffic Order, the effect of which is to draw attention to the regulatory burden placed upon the traffic authority by the Local Authorities’ Traffic Orders (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996, as follows:

Set out 107 (a) and (b).

As I understand the authority's position, they assert that I contravened the Order provision in Section 6 regarding a requirement to display 'a parking disc on the vehicle in the relevant position'. I assert that the traffic sign displayed - see *** in the authority's evidence- conveys no such requirement, thus placing the council in contravention of its own Order. In this regard, I refer the adjudicator to the Sign Tables at Parts 4 and 5 of Schedule 4 to the Traffic Signs etc. Regs which, I submit, place no such requirement upon Disabled Badge holders to display a 'parking disc' when parked in a parking place.

In short:
I accept that parking in the bay was time-limited; 
I was not parked beyond the time allowed - indeed, this has not been alleged by the authority;
The authority may enforce the provision in their Order but not by ascribing an unregulated meaning to a prescribed traffic sign, but by actual observation - which did not occur in this case.

I refer the adjudicator to section 107 of the authority's Traffic Order, the effect of which is to draw attention to the regulatory burden placed upon the traffic authority by the Local Authorities’ Traffic Orders (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996, as follows:

Set out 107 (a) and (b).

As I understand the authority's position, they assert that I contravened the Order provision in Section 6 regarding a requirement to display 'a parking disc on the vehicle in the relevant position'. I assert that the traffic sign displayed - see *** in the authority's evidence- conveys no such requirement, thus placing the council in contravention of its own Order. In this regard, I refer the adjudicator to the Sign Tables at Parts 4 and 5 of Schedule 4 to the Traffic Signs etc. Regs which, I submit, place no such requirement upon Disabled Badge holders to display a 'parking disc' when parked in a parking place.

In short:
I accept that parking in the bay was time-limited; 
I was not parked beyond the time allowed - indeed, this has not been alleged by the authority;
The authority may enforce the provision in their Order but not by ascribing an unregulated meaning to a prescribed traffic sign, but by actual observation - which did not occur in this case.

Thank you

Sorry my links seem to have gone wrong here is a link to Imgur showing road sign plus maps included in LCC evidence

https://imgur.com/a/NH8D4sK


Schedule 4 to the Traffic Signs please refer to t Parts 4 and 5

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/362/schedule/4

The adjudicator knows the Traffic Signs etc. Regs, the reference is there just for completeness. IMO, you don't need to cut and paste into your appeal nor provide a link, just refer.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

The adjudicator knows the Traffic Signs etc. Regs, the reference is there just for completeness. IMO, you don't need to cut and paste into your appeal nor provide a link, just refer.

Thank you for your help, shall I post my evidence now to expedite matters?

Yes, upload your appeal.

We recommend personal hearing.

As you have a case registered you must comply with TPT's procedural requirements.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Yes, upload your appeal.

We recommend personal hearing.

As you have a case registered you must comply with TPT's procedural requirements.

So sorry to post again, I was just looking through the evidence submitted by LCC

The informal challenge was made by the driver of the vehicle and blue badge holder

The formal rep after to NTO was started on 24/5/25  by the driver not the Vehicle owner but it was kindly pointed out that the formal rep had to be made by the owner, so separate formal rep file was started but some of the initial details were carried over ie the rep states that 'driver was the selected choice' see photo.  Will this cause a problem with the proceedings?

https://imgur.com/a/3eI4XxD

Thank you for the help received it's a successful appeal!

Adjudicator's Decision
PCN QJ4125144A

XXX, you have won this appeal.           
There is nothing to pay and the authority will cancel the penalty charge

Adjudicators reasons in image

https://imgur.com/a/ERTwa6F
« Last Edit: June 19, 2025, 08:10:46 pm by AnnePN »