Free Traffic Legal Advice

So Birmingham City Council have submitted their evidence including all the appeal and rejections, photos etc.. do I need to comment on them or just push it through to the independent adjudicator?

Date of hearing?
Birmingham send the Evidence Pack to the tribunal with a copy to you.
In the pack there should be a 1-3 page summary of why they think the tribunal should reject your appeal: also a list of contents. Please post these docs here.

Can't see anything that stands out as that summary.

I've included links to certain evidence.

I've listed all of their evidence below:

- PCN
- Case Report https://jmp.sh/s/7tXGdjpG7yF2X3nqPNS6
- Driver details check
- First appeal - where I was unaware that I had paid for my car instead of my wife's
- RingGo receipt for payment for my car
- Their initial rejection
- Follow up RE: first time mistakes
- Their second rejection
- Notice to owner
- Response to NTO
- RingGo receipt for payment for my car (again)
- Rejection of representations
- Their search of my RingGo account to show I hadn't paid for the car https://jmp.sh/s/7tXGdjpG7yF2X3nqPNS6
- Images of the car
- Birmingham City Council Off Street Parking Order https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pA5QGCePrWH8z2-wbVQRiQNOlq-4GqCe/view

Happy to upload more data if need, if need be.

I plan to reply to the RingGo account to show I have paid and they've kept that money even though the car wasn't in the car park.


I've got 3 days to reply to any of the above evidence. At that point it will then move to the adjudicator and hearing date will be given.

I plan to reply to the RingGo account to show I have paid and they've kept that money even though the car wasn't in the car park.

Why? IMO, it's distracting and is far less compelling than your main grounds. You would have to show that they misapplied their own policy.

But their policy appears to be discretionary on this point, so effectively you'd be asking the adjudicator to exercise that power which they cannot do.

That you paid the council is NOT your main grounds IMO.

I plan to reply to the RingGo account to show I have paid and they've kept that money even though the car wasn't in the car park.

Why? IMO, it's distracting and is far less compelling than your main grounds. You would have to show that they misapplied their own policy.

But their policy appears to be discretionary on this point, so effectively you'd be asking the adjudicator to exercise that power which they cannot do.

That you paid the council is NOT your main grounds IMO.

Ok cool. I won't mention this. I wasn't sure if I needed to add anything against there evidence given that I've already called out my pertinent point in the letter to the independent adjudicator.

Ok thanks. Will do and get it submitted so that it goes to tribunal.