Photos aren't mandatory but in any event the council's online photo evidence shows the car park noticeboard with clear Ts and Cs. The adjudicator would need to reassure themselves that the car was indeed in the stated car park (because the car and sign aren't together in the same shot) and then on this point the council's case would IMO be proved.
However, there's no reference to paying by phone on the noticeboard whereas online states the following:
The Grove Car Park
Pay and display (coins or cards accepted) or cashless parking using RingGo
If this is correct then IMO the contravention is incorrect because display is not a mandatory condition, simply an option. The grounds which cover P&D and cashless parking are:
Parked without payment of the parking charge
Many thanks - what is the view on the following appeal draft?
Dear Sir/Madam,
I'd like to challenge the PCN on the basis that the contravention did not occur.
The PCN issued states the contravention as "Parked in a car park without clearly displaying a valid pay and display ticket or voucher or parking clock." However, according to the online information provided by Slough Borough Council, The Grove Car Park allows for both pay and display (using coins or cards) and cashless parking via the RingGo service.
The car park noticeboard, as shown in the council's online photo evidence, does not mention the option to pay by phone, whereas the online information clearly states:
**The Grove Car Park**
- Pay and display (coins or cards accepted)
- Cashless parking using RingGo
Since the car park supports cashless parking, displaying a pay and display ticket is not a mandatory requirement but merely one of the payment options available. Therefore, the contravention should be "Parked without payment of the parking charge," which is fundamentally different from the one cited in the PCN.
I kindly request the cancellation of the PCN on the grounds that the contravention cited does not accurately reflect the terms and conditions of parking at The Grove Car Park. The availability of multiple payment methods, including cashless options, renders the requirement to display a ticket optional rather than mandatory.