Thank you.
I have used AI to help me draft a challenge.
Please can you have a quick look and advise if appropriate?
Thanks
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am writing to make formal representations against the above PCN for the alleged bus lane contravention (Code 34J).
After reviewing the council’s video evidence, it is clear that my vehicle entered the bus lane only momentarily — immediately before the end of the restriction. This was not an attempt to gain advantage or bypass traffic, but part of positioning safely. The incursion was minimal, brief, and occurred right at the termination point of the bus lane.
Importantly, the end of the bus lane was not clearly marked or sufficiently conspicuous at this location. There was inadequate visual distinction indicating where the restriction ceased, particularly for a driver focusing on surrounding traffic and preparing to turn. Without clear and prominent termination markings and signage, a driver cannot reasonably be expected to judge the exact point the restriction ends in real time. This makes enforcement at that precise location unfair.
Given:
The extremely short duration of travel in the lane
The fact this occurred immediately at the end of the restriction
No advantage was gained and no bus was impeded
The lack of clear termination markings
this falls squarely within the principle of a trivial or de minimis incursion. Enforcement in these circumstances is disproportionate.
I respectfully request that the council exercise its discretion and cancel this PCN.
I look forward to your confirmation that this PCN has been cancelled.
Yours faithfully,
