OK so there's the 0845 argument as per
Paul Bateman v Derbyshire County Council (DJ00037-2209, 10 November 2022) and I have
this handy FOI response to use as evidence of their wrongdoing.
Then there's the requirement to convey that you must park within bay markings, see the decisions linked in column D of rows 297 to 307
here.
Finally I will request the traffic order. For now you only need to make informal reps, these will undoubtedly be rejected but it gets the ball rolling.
Dear Denbighshire County Council,
Firstly I challenge liability because the alleged contravention did not occur. There was no indication that vehicles must park within the painted bays, if sucha requirement exists in the traffic regulation order this has not been conveyed to motorists.
I refer you to the decision in Cooper v London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames (1990292199, 18 July 2000) available from LINK1 as followed in the following cases:
Ernesto Villa Blandino v London Borough of Barnet (2110474195, 28 November 2011) at LINK2
Michal Budai v London Borough of Barnet (2120008348, 06 February 2012) at LINK3
Caroline Ratner v London Borough of Barnet (2140338414, 10 September 2014) at LINK4
Cheryl Kuczynski v London Borough of Barnet (2160033974, 30 April 2016) at LINK5
Sultan Gangji v London Borough of Barnet (2160439695, 15 November 2016) at LINK6
Tecwyn Evans v London Borough of Merton (2160499981, 05 January 2017) at LINK7
Gerald Halibard v London Borough of Barnet (2170225166, 15 June 2017) at LINK8
Lamin Sesay v London Borough of Southwark (2180188510, 22 June 2018) at LINK9
Anthony Westmore v London Borough of Barnet (2180064744, 15 March 2018) at LINK10
Keren Lewin v London Borough of Haringey (2190290943, 28 August 2019) at LINK11
Secondly the penalty demanded exceeds the amount due in the circumstances of the case, because the PCN provides a premium rate number that attracts a surcharge for the council's benefit. For the reasons explained in Paul Bateman v Derbyshire County Council (DJ00037-2209, 10 November 2022) available from LINK12.
In light of the above the penalty charge must be cancelled.
Yours faithfully,
I will PM you the links to put in the representation, they will redirect to the same locations as given on the spreadsheet but if you give them the links I'll PM you, we can use the click count to confirm whether they've looked at them or not (obviously do not click on that link yourself as we want the click count to remain at zero). If they don't click on them, we can then prove they've failed to consider all of the representations. If they say in the rejection that they've considered everything you've said, we've got them for lying as well.