Thanks, that’s really helpful. I did notice the signs in the PCN images, but I agree they look unusually high, and I honestly don’t recall seeing them when driving through. If they’re mounted higher than typical, that does make me question whether they’re sufficiently visible to drivers in real conditions.
That’s interesting about the blue signs and camera signage not being required as well — I hadn’t considered that. Do you think it’s worth pursuing an appeal on the basis that the overall signage (especially the height/placement) isn’t adequate, even if this specific point hasn’t really been tested at London Tribunals yet? Or would I need stronger grounds alongside that?
