3. 52M Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle RMV Rivercourt Rd NthBnd adj nos 17
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: 52M Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle RMV Rivercourt Rd NthBnd adj nos 17  (Read 128 times)

0 Members and 23 Guests are viewing this topic.

52M Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle RMV Rivercourt Rd NthBnd adj nos 17
« on: »
I have seen this topic before, but wondered if anything has changed as I received my PCN this morning.  I do not recall seeing any signage. 

Is there any strong evidence people have used recently to overturn this, or do I pay the £80?
Logged

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook

Re: 52M Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle RMV Rivercourt Rd NthBnd adj nos 17
« Reply #1 on: »
https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/read-this-first-before-posting-your-case!-this-section-is-for-council-tfl-dartme/

Welcome. As we do not have the surnames "Holmes" or "Kent", please post your details as advised above.  ;D

I use humour to survive this crazy game!

Anyway, is this Hammersmith and Fulham?
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 07:25:32 pm by Hippocrates »
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: 52M Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle RMV Rivercourt Rd NthBnd adj nos 17
« Reply #2 on: »
I dont understand your response. Have I done something wrong in posting this?
Logged
Re: 52M Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle RMV Rivercourt Rd NthBnd adj nos 17
« Reply #3 on: »
Quote from: PinkSkiBoot on Yesterday at 03:41:53 pm
I dont understand your response. Have I done something wrong in posting this?
No, not at all, but there are certain basic things we requuest all Original Posters (OPs) put in their thread. Hippocrates has posted the instructions. Just update your thread with whatever is now missing.
Logged
Re: 52M Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle RMV Rivercourt Rd NthBnd adj nos 17
« Reply #4 on: »
Quote from: PinkSkiBoot on Yesterday at 03:41:53 pm
I dont understand your response. Have I done something wrong in posting this?
Nope, just me being silly. I meant Sherlock Holmes and Clark Kent aka the guy from Krypton. ;D I did not mean to cause any offence for which I apologise if that is the case.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 07:20:35 pm by Hippocrates »
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: 52M Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle RMV Rivercourt Rd NthBnd adj nos 17
« Reply #5 on: »
Quote from: PinkSkiBoot on Yesterday at 02:04:37 pm
I have seen this topic before, but wondered if anything has changed as I received my PCN this morning.  I do not recall seeing any signage.  52M Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle RMV Rivercourt Rd NthBnd adj nos 17.  Driving off the A4 and turning left onto Rivercourt Road. I didn't see any signage saying local traffic only and the road is no different to any other. However I now see the cameras above, but given London has cameras pretty much everywhere I didn't pay much attention to that either. 

Since the last post on this which was over a year ago. Is anyone aware of new signage?

Is there any strong evidence people have used recently to overturn this, or do I pay the £80?
Logged
Re: 52M Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle RMV Rivercourt Rd NthBnd adj nos 17
« Reply #6 on: »
Don't pay just yet. This is one of the worst street restrictions ever brought in by a council., What ever thick and stupid official decided this was OK clearly needs to be put in a playpen with a box of toys !

The latest GSV view shows the temporary, non-traffic, sign that was hastily put up to warn approaching motorists. This is total crap. It is clear that the council did not carry out their legal duties under The Local Authorities’ Traffic Orders (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996

The Local Authorities’ Traffic Orders (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996
These Regulations prescribe the procedure to be followed by local authorities in England and Wales for making the main types of traffic and parking orders under the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984...
legislation.gov.uk


Look at Regulation 6 (1) duty to consult. No proper warning signs put up on the A40 so clearly the authority for that was ignored

Also Regulation 18 (1)(a)
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
  3. 52M Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle RMV Rivercourt Rd NthBnd adj nos 17