@RS123 I can't see any obvious issues, I have found the map tile at https://store.traffweb.app/croydon/documents/parkmap/msched/N14_rv2_2.pdf and the signs seem to be located where they should be.
This is the sort of case where I'd suggest the strategy of last resort described here.
Do you have any mitigation we could use?
Thank you
@cp8759. In terms of mitigation, I am currently going through a divorce (with children involved). The 'Conditional Order' was going in front of a judge on 15th March and this alleged contravention happened on 13th March; I don't know if that would be considered mitigating...
At the same time, I would like to make some reps on the basis of:
1) Inadequate signage
- A single warning sign has been placed on the left hand side of the road only (as opposed to on both sides of the road), next to a cycle storage unit and there are a number of parked vehicles so, with all of this to consider, the sign could easily be missed.
- The regulatory signs themselves on the approach to the junction of Holmesdale and Park Road are confusing. Given that one is approaching a junction, one would not expect to be entering a restricted zone. In addition, as bollards are visible across the junction, one might think that the restricted zone being referred to is the section (continuation) of Holmesdale Road located across the junction, rather than the small section of Holmesdale Road leading up to the junction.
2) Purpose of the signage is redundant
Which 'zone' are the regulatory signs meant to be demarcating? Essentially the council has put up an isolated a regulatory sign to create a line in the road near the junction with another busy road, thereby generating revenue on the basis of creating a 'healthy neighbourhood' the extent of which is a section of road a few metres long and wide.
I would argue that there is no protected zone since the signs are almost at the junction of Holmesdale Road and Park Road, and therefore the traffic management reasons for the signage are defunct. There is an isolated sign near the top of Holmesdale Road, which has no overall purpose certainly not the one dictated by the Traffic Order.
3) The PCN is defective
The Contravention Code is required to have a suffix indicating which vehicles are prohibited. Since it does not, a procedural error is apparent and the PCN is null and void.
Any advice on what I am thinking of putting forward tomorrow would be appreciated.