Redbridge is not very good at providing evidence to he tribunal of its various zones.
If this is one zone it's not compliant with guidance in my view and should not have any yellow lines. It should also have zone ends signs on all exits. Repeater signs are obviously scattered around but they are confusing as they are not adjacent to parking bays.
Traffic map, traffic signs manual and a tribunal case below that references that left hand sign.
They seem to have gone mad with these PPAs.


--------
Case reference 2250151042
Appellant xxxxxx
Authority London Borough of Redbridge
VRM KS23VYK
PCN Details
PCN AF08541629
Contravention date 14 Jan 2025
Contravention time 13:52:00
Contravention location Wellington Road
Penalty amount GBP 130.00
Contravention Parked resident/shared use without a valid permit
Referral date -
Decision Date 23 May 2025
Adjudicator Philippa Alderson
Appeal decision Appeal allowed
Direction
cancel the Penalty Charge Notice/Enforcement Notice.
Reasons
The Appellant is appealing a PCN issued in respect of parking in a permit holder only zone during restricted hours at the location.
The Appellant has attended the hearing.
The Council relies upon the contemporaneous evidence of the Civil Enforcement Officer, a copy of the PCN, map/site report, a copy of the relevant legislation and correspondence.
The Appellant contends that the signage at the entrance to Wellington Road was not readily visible as it had been turned sideway at the relevant time.
I have carefully considered all the evidence in this matter.
The CEO’s photographs show the vehicle parked and unattended on an unmarked section of carriageway on Wellington Road. The CEO has also provided a photograph of the signage relied upon. However, the proximity of the signage to the vehicle cannot be determined from the CEO's photographic evidence and the sign is not readily obvious in any of the photographs of the vehicle itself. One of the additional photographs provided by the Council denotes, by way of yellow arrow, relevant signage in relation to the vehicle, but such signage is on the opposite side of the road and it would be reasonable of a driver not to see/pay attention to such signage.
The Appellant has provided photographic evidence of relevant signage at the entrance to Wellington Road from the High Street. These photographs show this sign, on the left of the carriageway, to be turned through some 90 degrees, to the extent that I find it not to be sufficiently visible to drivers entering the road. Whilst the Council's photographic evidence shows there to be another similar sign on the right of the carriageway, I am not satisfied that this right hand sign alone is sufficient to indicate the restriction to drivers entering the road. Once a driver has missed the entry point sign, that driver may conclude, in the absence of road markings, that the street is unrestricted.
I therefore allow this appeal.