Skip to content

Bristol council - Driving in Bus Gate PCN X2 OB93432128 & OB9342196A

820 Views 6 Replies

0 Members and 44 Guests are viewing this topic.

#1
I have received two PCN for driving through the no infamous Cumberland Rd bus gate in Bristol which has been featured on BBC news for being unlawful



I would really appreciate some advice on how jest to appeal this? I am assuming the council are recieving a lot of appeals on this one based on how many people are being caught by it.

Many thanks

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
#2
Well, it certainly does appear to be unlawful, because it is not a permitted variant of sign 953 in Schedule 5 of The Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002. A motorcycle symbol is not a permitted addition to the sign.

This Instrument consolidates with substantial amendments the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 1994 and their amending instruments. Part I comprises the Traffic Signs Regulations 200...
legislation.gov.uk


However, are you prepared to take them to the adjudicators ? Any representations you submit to Bristol Council will be kicked into touch because they know if they refuse everything, most people then just cough up.
#5
Well it seems the Bristol sign is legal see below: -

This Instrument consolidates, with substantial amendments, the Zebra, Pelican and Puffin Pedestrian Crossings Regulations and General Directions 1997, the Traffic Signs (Temporary Obstructions) Reg...
legislation.gov.uk


See Diagram 953B

So I have egg on my face ! Sackcloth and ashes time.

Apologies to all concerned with this thread.
#6
Thank you for the responses. Can you advise on the best why to proceed. I've been advised on another group to do a grovelling apology for one and then ask they the second be considered as a 'continous contravention'. Would you agree with this?

Many thanks
#7
Maybe not 'grovelling', but certainly non-confrontational !
As for the second PCN, the "continuous contravention" is used for parking when a vehicle is left parked for two or more days, so I don't think this argument would apply.  However, you could argue 'disproportionate penalty", if you only became aware of making the contravention when the first PCN arrived in the post, and the second is dated between that date and the date of receipt of the first PCN.