3. Least worst PPC?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Least worst PPC?  (Read 560 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

guest46

  • Guest
Re: Least worst PPC?
« Reply #15 on: October 21, 2023, 04:51:04 pm »
Quote from: DancingDad on October 21, 2023, 03:10:47 pm
Quote from: cp8759 on October 21, 2023, 02:54:21 pm
.......
I would suggest a PPC could cause quite a few issues with residents making mistakes and then being potentially taken to court. A few posts and padlocks would avoid any issues of this sort.

The issue of visitors is not really an issue, even on a loading restriction you're allowed to stop while you go and get a key or open a barrier to access private property.

I'm favouring this option.
Keys to residents and carers/family would be an option
Or an auto barrier with key code and intercom.... more expensive but still more resident friendly then a PPC.

Or as Andy says, a self ticketing system and a few signs??

I too wondered about a barrier and access pass/fob, but even this has adminstrative issues the premises manager won't want vs an ANPR set-up that the PPC is wholly responsible for. I agree they'll all parasites of course!
Logged

cp8759

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5072
  • Karma: +122/-4
    • View Profile
Re: Least worst PPC?
« Reply #16 on: October 21, 2023, 07:30:10 pm »
Quote from: M60NJP on October 21, 2023, 04:51:04 pm
I too wondered about a barrier and access pass/fob, but even this has adminstrative issues the premises manager won't want vs an ANPR set-up that the PPC is wholly responsible for. I agree they'll all parasites of course!
Sounds like a very lazy manager to me. Have you considered right to manage?
Logged
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor nor a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order

DancingDad

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 322
  • Karma: +11/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Least worst PPC?
« Reply #17 on: October 21, 2023, 08:54:10 pm »
Point out to the Premises Manager that every complaint arising from PPC actions will be directed to them to deal with.
And that there will be many.

Your mention of them favouring ANPR makes it worse though is a favoured model of PPCs
It will catch unregistered vehicles and as such deter regulars from the dentist etc but will also provide a steady stream of pukka parkers such as family, carers, residents who for whatever reason have not a registered car.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »
  3. Least worst PPC?