Free Traffic Legal Advice

A kind-hearted citizen has reported me for allegedly jumping a red light—if indeed it was me. From what I can make out in the picture, it appears I was in a queue at temporary traffic lights and overtook two cars to take a right turn. It feels a bit petty, but I understand it is still an offence.

The image provided by the police is a poor-quality laser-printed copy, and I cannot clearly read the number plate. Additionally, there is a discrepancy between the time on the image and the time on what I presume to be dash cam footage.

I contacted the police to ask about this discrepancy, and they responded by saying the dash cam was set to BST. They also stated they have a signed witness statement confirming this. Despite this, they have refused to provide a better-quality image, although they have confirmed that one exists. They have said this higher-quality image will only be shown to me if I take the matter to court.

My car is quite distinctive, and the location of the alleged offence is near my home. However, there is an identical vehicle just half a mile away.

Should I return the NIP stating that I cannot confirm whether it was me because the number plate is unclear? If I do, what are the potential consequences?

Hopefully, your advise is better than your reading skills.

Should I return the NIP stating that I cannot confirm whether it was me because the number plate is unclear? If I do, what are the potential consequences?

6 points and a fine, and substantially increased future insurance premiums. You'll be prosecuted for failing to provide the driver's details. The photo is purely a courtesy, it is not evidence. They have the evidence of (presumably) a video and a witness statement. You are not entitled to it unless you go to court.

Being sarcastic to people offering advice (note the spelling) is likely to result in you getting no more.