Free Traffic Legal Advice

upload folder full could not upload any pics

OP, can you please stick either to Imperial or metric?

sorry my car is 1780cm wide and my nearside wheel was 200cm from centre line. the road was 3m to centre line even if you take off the 200cm from the 3m . how can anysay i did not give room to a single cycleist ?

sorry my car is 1780cm wide and my nearside wheel was 200cm from centre line. the road was 3m to centre line even if you take off the 200cm from the 3m . how can anysay i did not give room to a single cycleist ?

Just about all of your figures are out by a factor of 10.

I'm assuming that you meant that your car was 20cm from the centre line and not 200cm.

If the road was 300cm wide, your car is 178cm wide and you were 20cm from the centre line then even if the cyclist was tight up against the side of the road, the furthest you could have been from them is 102cm.
Allowing for the cyclist to be even 10cm from the side of the road then you must have been closer than 1m when you passed.

my nearside wheel was 200cm from centre line.

Which side of it, there is a 400cm (or more likely 40cm difference (plus width of the line) between one side of it and the other!

Your descriptions so far are as clear as mud.

We know the width you have given for the lane (location on Google and we can measure it)
You've given a width for the car but don't say if hat includes mirrors or not.
You've given a description for the position of your car which can be one of two places.
We've no idea where the cyclist was.

Just throwing out numbers is of little help.

The Guidance is 1.5m, but you can still be convicted of careless driving further away than that if your driving fell below the standard of a careful and competent driver.

do as we already know the HC is "guidance" is there really a case for plod to consider it a dangerous pass if the driver gave less than 1.5m ? I'm not suggesting significantly less. If yes then why does the HC not state "must" as in a legal definition

Road Traffic Act 1988, s 38(7):

A failure on the part of a person to observe a provision of the Highway Code shall not of itself render that person liable to criminal proceedings of any kind but any such failure may in any proceedings (whether civil or criminal, and including proceedings for an offence under the Traffic Acts, the Public Passenger Vehicles Act 1981 or sections 18 to 23 of the Transport Act 1985) be relied upon by any party to the proceedings as tending to establish or negative any liability which is in question in those proceedings.