1: Yes the defendant is the registered keeper.
2: No they were not the driver
3: It has not been appealed (see next 3 paragraphs)
4: The drivers identity has not been revealed, it was simply done in the name of the keeper & recipient of the PCN
Further up into this thread it was also established that the appeal date was closed off 1 or 2 days early by the online
site where it offers an appeal. In short, no appeal was possible under their dates etc.
In short, the date of the alleged incident was 28/04/24
The pcn they sent was dated 30/4/24
An attempt to enter an appeal on their website was made on 27/05/24 which when attempting to submit
came back with a ‘Not eligible for appeal has been referred to their debt recovery team.}
I took a snapshot of the screen from the site, it clearly shows the date in small lettering at
the foot of the not eligible page as being 27/05/2024
I believe from info within this thread that they did not give the required amount of time (days)
to offer an appeal even.
I’ll attempt to file the AOS in a short while or tomorrow during the day, if successful i’ll come back to
here for your defence draft.
Your efforts are much appreciated thus far.
Stupid thing is the driver is registered as disabled and did have a badge and it was displayed but UK Parking
photos were very clever and did not show the badge, furthermore I’m not sure what their summons means when
it states the badge was not displayed in the displayed manner? On the sign (further up the thread) it just
states clearly displayed (which it was) just not on the front screen. What is a ‘displayed manner'
