Free Traffic Legal Advice

Hi,

Would appreciate your advice please.

Have see other posts regarding similar issue and wanted some advice before appealing with the standard template letters.

Parked duration: 1 hour

UKCPS has provided photographic evidence of the parked car only (no driver/passenger photos) and a photo of the signage: https://ibb.co/v63NstJm

I am the registered Keeper

I have attached the letter to this post
https://ibb.co/qM8C0NKb
https://ibb.co/SXGJX1nB



thank you

i've added a photo of the signage posted by UKCPS to original post, however it's not clear what it says from their image.

Quote from: parkinghelpplease on February 07, 2026, 05:09:12 pm

i've added a photo of the signage posted by UKCPS to original post, however it's not clear what it says from their image.

The photo of the signage doesn't work, please can you try again?

However you uploaded the letters worked, so maybe do the same?

signage link added in original post

The original PCN is not PoFA compliant.

As pointed out already, it is missing essential mandatory wording from Schedule 4 para. 9(2)(e).

It is also missing the required 'period of parking' - only a single time stamp is provided - this is insufficient information.

Thank you, therefore I shall submit an appeal via email using the template letter pointing out that this PCN is not PoFA compliant.

Sorry for the delay in replying as I was unable to access this forum due to the webpage not working/loading.

Here is the statement that I will be using:

I am the keeper of the vehicle and I dispute your 'parking charge'. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your client landowner.

As your Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not fully comply with ALL the requirements of PoFA 2012, you are unable to hold the keeper of the vehicle liable for the charge. Partial or even substantial compliance is not sufficient. There will be no admission as to who was driving and no inference or assumptions can be drawn. UKCPS has relied on contract law allegations of breach against the driver only.

The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have been the driver, nor pursued under some twisted interpretation of the law of agency. Your NtK can only hold the driver liable. UKCPS have no hope should you try and litigate this, so you are urged to save us both a complete waste of time and cancel the PCN.