Free Traffic Legal Advice

I am the keeper of the vehicle and I dispute your 'parking charge'. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your client landowner.

As your Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not fully comply with ALL the requirements of PoFA 2012, you are unable to hold the keeper of the vehicle liable for the charge. Partial or even substantial compliance is not sufficient. There will be no admission as to who was driving and no inference or assumptions can be drawn. UKPE has relied on contract law allegations of breach against the driver only.

The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have been the driver, nor pursued under some twisted interpretation of the law of agency. Your NtK can only hold the driver liable. UKPE have no hope at POPLA, so you are urged to save us both a complete waste of time and cancel the PCN.

Subject: [PCN Number] – Formal Demand for Proof of Appeal Response / POPLA Code

Dear Sirs,

I am the keeper of vehicle registration LW08NFY. My appeal was lodged on [date]. The only correspondence ever received from you is your correspondence of 9 September 2025, which merely sought the identity of the driver. I have never received a rejection or a POPLA code.

For the avoidance of doubt, I expressly rebut any presumption of delivery. If you claim a rejection and POPLA code were issued, you are now put to strict proof of posting and delivery. That means:

• A dated copy of the rejection letter or email containing the POPLA code;
• Proof of posting (certificate of posting, batch manifest, or equivalent postal record) or, for email, full SMTP headers and server transmission logs evidencing successful delivery; and
• Your system or CRM audit logs confirming the date and method of dispatch.

For the record, the Interpretation Act 1978, section 7 and Civil Procedure Rule 6.26 both make clear that the presumption of service is rebuttable upon denial of receipt, as is the case here. Mere assertions or template screenshots are not proof of posting or delivery.

Absent such proof, you must now either:

• Cancel the PCN outright; or
• Re-issue a proper rejection to the keeper together with a fresh POPLA code, placing the matter on hold to allow a full appeal.

Passing the file to ZZZPS before concluding the appeal process is improper and ignored. Debt collectors have no authority or standing in law, and I will not engage with them.

If you fail to comply within 7 days, I will consider this matter formally unresolved and will take further action without notice. This may include an application for disclosure of your dispatch and system records, and a claim for damages and costs arising from unlawful debt recovery activity in the absence of a valid rejection and appeal route.

Yours faithfully,

[Name]

Subject: Subject Access Request (UK GDPR/DPA 2018) – PCN [ref], VRM LW08NFY

Data Protection Officer/UK Parking Enforcement Ltd
info@ukpenforcement.co.uk

Dear DPO,

This is a Subject Access Request under UK GDPR Article 15 and the Data Protection Act 2018. I am the registered keeper of VRM LW08NFY. The controller reference is PCN [ref].

Please provide all personal data that you hold about me and my vehicle, in a commonly used electronic format, including the following specific items and their metadata/timestamps:

• Appeal handling & dispatch records
• Full copy of my appeal and all inbound/outbound correspondence (letters, emails, portal messages, SMS) including any rejection and POPLA code you say was issued.
• Proof of posting/delivery for any rejection/POPLA: certificates of posting, postal/batch manifests, tracking data; or, for email, full SMTP headers, transmission/server logs, and delivery status notifications.
• Internal CRM/system audit logs showing creation, approval, and dispatch of those items.
• Enforcement file
• NtD/NtK images and PDFs (all versions), ANPR or manual images and the raw image files, time stamps, location coordinates, camera IDs, sync/clock drift records, and any manual notes/observations.
• DVLA & third-party data
• KADOE enquiry date/time, the data you received from DVLA, and the lawful basis you relied upon.
• All data shared with ZZZPS or any other processors/agents, including dates, purposes, and legal basis, plus copies of the data actually transmitted.
• Account metadata
• All data fields you hold about me (names/addresses/emails you store), data sources, data retention periods, categories of recipients, and any international transfers.
• Details of any profiling or automated decision-making applied.

Statutory matters:
There should be no charge for this SAR. The statutory time limit is one month from receipt (Article 12(3)). If you claim complexity and need up to two additional months, you must notify me within one month, explaining why.

Please send the response to [your email]. I also require a brief confirmation that you have started processing this SAR.

Restriction & objection (Articles 18 and 21): Pending your SAR response and a lawful conclusion of the appeal process, I object to further processing for debt collection and require you to restrict processing (no further contact from any debt collector, no additional data sharing or escalation).

Identity: I attach proof of keeper status (V5C). Please confirm safe receipt.

Yours faithfully,

[Full name]
[Address]
[Email]
[Date]

Attachments: Redacted V5C