Dear sir,
I refer to your Letter of Claim dated 17 March 2026.
I deny any debt to your client.
The vehicle was not “parked” in the ordinary sense but was temporarily stopped for the purpose of delivering parcels to residents at a residential development. This is a normal and incidental use of the premises and does not constitute parking in breach of any contractual terms.
Your client’s reliance on ANPR timestamps fails to distinguish between parking and necessary delivery activity. This is supported by established case law (e.g. Jopson v Homeguard [2016]) which, while not binding, is highly persuasive in similar residential contexts.
Further, your client has failed to provide strict proof of:
• Sufficient landowner authority to override residents’ rights to receive deliveries
• That the signage clearly prohibits temporary delivery activity
• That any contract was capable of being formed in the circumstances
Please provide the following documents so that I may properly consider your client’s position:
1. A full unredacted copy of the contract with the landowner
2. Evidence of planning/authority for ANPR enforcement at this site
3. Full signage terms relied upon, including location and visibility evidence
4. Evidence that delivery/loading is expressly prohibited
Pending provision of the above, the matter is disputed and any proceedings will be robustly defended.
I also put you on notice that I will seek to rely on this correspondence in relation to costs should your client proceed unreasonably.
Yours faithfully
Also should I email which is mentioned at the top or fill the form link they have given in the letter?
