3. Smart Parking Ltd – Inital Appeal Rejected – Incorrect Details - Parking Without A Valid Ticket - Paisley, Scotland
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Smart Parking Ltd – Inital Appeal Rejected – Incorrect Details - Parking Without A Valid Ticket - Paisley, Scotland  (Read 56 times)

0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

Smart Parking Ltd – Inital Appeal Rejected – Incorrect Details - Parking Without A Valid Ticket - Paisley, Scotland
« on: »

Hey Folks,

I was issued a private parking charge notice from Smart Parking Ltd as I am the registered keeper of the vehicle V44RNW. I received this on the 27th of the May 2026.
One key thing to mention up front is that the PCN is issued to a Silver Daewoo but my car is a Grey Skoda. I did not mention this in my appeal, as I used a standard template I have for PCNs.

Smart parking has returned and rejected my appeal. I am now looking for advice on how to appeal to ISA, and what to say to them if possible.

Private Charge Notice Details:
Number: SP10304290
Date: 27/05/26
Time: 09:51
Place: Weighhouse Close, Paisley, PA1 1AG
Registration: V44RNW
Make: Daewoo (THIS IS INCORRECT)
Colour: Silver (THIS IS INCORRECT)
Contravention: 06 - Parked Without A Valid Ticket

PCN Details:
Screenshot 2026 06 11 194812 hosted at ImgBB
Image Screenshot 2026 06 11 194812 hosted on ImgBB
ImgBB · ibb.co


Inital Appeal
Screenshot 2026 06 11 194843 hosted at ImgBB
Image Screenshot 2026 06 11 194843 hosted on ImgBB
ImgBB · ibb.co


Appeal Rejected:
Screenshot 2026 06 11 194924 hosted at ImgBB
Image Screenshot 2026 06 11 194924 hosted on ImgBB
ImgBB · ibb.co


Any and all advice would be amazing and appreciated!






Logged

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook

Re: Smart Parking Ltd – Inital Appeal Rejected – Incorrect Details - Parking Without A Valid Ticket - Paisley, Scotland
« Reply #1 on: »
A few things here as far as  POFA does not apply in Scotland so they cannot pursue the registered keeper under that Act as stated in their rejection.Therefore IAS appeal is not required it is just general contract law. I see they are trying the old chestnut of Elliott Vs Loake a criminal matter south of the border. You will probably receive a NTK there is no requirement to engage with the parking company and as it is a one off then they will not in my opinion pursue the matter. You can if you wish write to them and stare in no uncertain terms that there are a number of cases where Elliott Vs Loake have been firmly rebuked in Courts. You can read the case and outline your reasons that this case is not applicable. There was ample evidence to prove he was the driver.There was forensic evidence etc.
Logged
Re: Smart Parking Ltd – Inital Appeal Rejected – Incorrect Details - Parking Without A Valid Ticket - Paisley, Scotland
« Reply #2 on: »
You have the option of ignoring everything from now on. You pointed out that keeper liability does not apply (and you found out that Smart no longer is a member of the BPA) and at this point I’d be tempted to leave it at that. The IAS will only deny your appeal anyway. In England we still advise appealing to the IAS because if the case actually made it to court it would look better for you to have done so, but the chances of this making it to court in Scotland are very small. If you get a Letter of Intimation (I think that’s what it’s called in Scotland) then come back here and post it.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
  3. Smart Parking Ltd – Inital Appeal Rejected – Incorrect Details - Parking Without A Valid Ticket - Paisley, Scotland