Author Topic: NCP Manchester - Parked without payment  (Read 668 times)

0 Members and 127 Guests are viewing this topic.

NCP Manchester - Parked without payment
« on: »
The driver visited the cinema on 3rd May and parked at an NCP car park that offers 4 hours of discounted parking when a code is entered into the NCP app. The driver already had the app and the correct code (which had been used successfully before), but is unsure whether they pressed the 'Park Now' button on this occasion. It may have been an honest mistake or a technical glitch. The app is supposed to automatically take payment from the credit card linked to the account, but no payment was taken this time.

The driver was unaware of this until I, the registered keeper of the vehicle, received a Parking Charge Notice (PCN). The notice was dated 16th May — 13 days after the incident — and it arrived on 21st May, which is 18 days after the parking event.

The driver feels a moral responsibility, as they should have checked the app to ensure the payment was processed. However, from what I’ve read on a forum, NCP may not have grounds to pursue this charge because the notice was posted too late.

Can I follow the advice given in the following thread and submit my appeal using the wording suggested there?
https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/ncp-parking-charge-to-keeper-parked-without-payment-church-st-kings-lynn/msg72742/#msg72742

https://ibb.co/9HNkJXwq
Image Notice-Pg2 in the Stuart Little's images album
ImgBB · ibb.co


Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Re: NCP Manchester - Parked without payment
« Reply #1 on: »
It will be “deemed to arrive” on 20 May, 2 days after posting, but that’s still > 14 days after the event.
Like Like x 1 View List

Re: NCP Manchester - Parked without payment
« Reply #2 on: »
Non-PoFA appeal FTLA

Easy one to deal with… as long as the unknown drivers identity is not revealed. There is no legal obligation on the known keeper (the recipient of the Notice to Keeper (NtK)) to reveal the identity of the unknown driver and no inference or assumptions can be made.

The NtK is not compliant with all the requirements of PoFA which means that if the unknown driver is not identified, they cannot transfer liability for the charge from the unknown driver to the known keeper.

Use the following as your appeal. No need to embellish or remove anything from it:

Quote
I am the keeper of the vehicle and I dispute your 'parking charge'. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your client landowner.

As your Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not fully comply with ALL the requirements of PoFA 2012, you are unable to hold the keeper of the vehicle liable for the charge. Partial or even substantial compliance is not sufficient. There will be no admission as to who was driving and no inference or assumptions can be drawn. NCP has relied on contract law allegations of breach against the driver only.

The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have been the driver, nor pursued under some twisted interpretation of the law of agency. Your NtK can only hold the driver liable. NCP have no hope at POPLA, so you are urged to save us both a complete waste of time and cancel the PCN.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain
Like Like x 1 View List

Re: NCP Manchester - Parked without payment
« Reply #3 on: »
As they have also breached section 8.1.1(d) of the PPSCoP, they are therefore also using your Keeper data unlawfully. You should submit a formal complaint to the DVLA.

Here’s how to make a DVLA complaint:

• Go to:
contact.dvla.gov.uk

• Select: “Making a complaint or compliment about the Vehicles service you have received”
• Enter your personal details, contact details, and vehicle details
• Use the text box to summarise your complaint or insert a covering note
• You will then be able to upload a file (up to 19.5 MB) — this can be your full complaint or supporting evidence
That’s it.

The DVLA is required to record, investigate and respond to every complaint about a private parking company. If everyone who encounters a breach took the time to submit a complaint, we might finally see the DVLA take meaningful action—whether that means curtailing or removing KADOE access altogether.

For the text part of the complaint the webform could use the following:

Quote
I am submitting a formal complaint against National Car Parks Ltd (NCP), a BPA AOS member with DVLA KADOE access, for breaching the BPA/IPC Private Parking Single Code of Practice (PPSCoP) after obtaining my personal data.

While the Operator may have had reasonable cause at the time of their KADOE request, their subsequent misuse of my data—through conduct that contravenes the PPSCoP—renders that use unlawful. The PPSCoP forms an integral part of the DVLA’s governance framework for data access by private parking firms. Continued access is conditional on compliance.

The DVLA, as data controller, is obliged under UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 to investigate and take enforcement action when data is misused following release. This complaint is not about whether the data was obtained lawfully at the outset, but whether its subsequent use breached the terms under which it was provided.

I have prepared a supporting statement setting out the nature of the breach and the Operator’s actions, and I request a full investigation into this matter. I have attached the supporting document.

Please acknowledge receipt and confirm the reference number for this complaint.

Then you could upload the following as a PDF file for the formal complaint itself:

Quote
SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Complaint to DVLA – Breach of KADOE Contract and PPSCoP

Operator name: National Car Parks Ltd (NCP)
Date of PCN issue: 16/05/2025
Vehicle registration: [INSERT VRM]

I am submitting this complaint to report a misuse of my personal data by NCP, who obtained my keeper details from the DVLA under the KADOE (Keeper At Date Of Event) contract.

Although NCP may have had reasonable cause to request my data initially, the way they have used that data afterwards amounts to unlawful processing. This is because they have acted in breach of the BPA/IPC Private Parking Single Code of Practice (PPSCoP), which is a mandatory requirement for access to DVLA keeper data. The PPSCoP forms part of the framework that regulates how parking companies must behave once they have received keeper data from the DVLA.

The KADOE contract makes clear that keeper data may only be used to pursue an unpaid parking charge in line with the Code of Practice. If a parking company fails to comply with the PPSCoP after receiving DVLA data, their use of that data becomes unlawful, as they are no longer using it for a permitted purpose.

In this case, NCP has breached the PPSCoP in the following way:

• NCP failed to deliver the Notice to Keeper within 14 days of the alleged event on 03/05/2025. The notice was issued on 16/05/2025 and, under PoFA Schedule 4, is deemed ‘given’ two working days later (20/05/2025), outside the statutory 14-day period. Therefore, NCP cannot rely on the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 to hold the registered keeper liable.

• Despite this, NCP’s Notice to Keeper contains a paragraph that misleadingly states:

“…we will have the right to recover from you, so much of that Parking Charge as remains unpaid.”

• This statement falsely asserts a right to hold the keeper liable, when in fact such a right does not exist. This is in clear breach of PPSCoP Section 8.1.1(d), which states:

The parking operator must not serve a notice which in its design and/or language: state the keeper is liable under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 where they cannot be held liable.”

This is not a technicality—it is a serious breach of both the Code and the legal framework governing keeper data use. It misleads recipients into believing they are legally obliged to pay a charge when no such liability exists under law.

The DVLA remains the Data Controller for the data it releases under KADOE, and is responsible for ensuring that personal data is not misused by third parties. This includes taking enforcement action against AOS operators who breach the conditions under which the data was provided. I am therefore asking the DVLA to investigate this breach and take appropriate action under the terms of the KADOE contract.

This may include:

• Confirming that a breach has occurred
• Taking enforcement action against the operator
• Suspending or terminating their KADOE access if warranted

I have attached relevant supporting material with this statement. Please confirm receipt and provide a reference for this complaint. I am also happy to provide further information if required.

Name: [INSERT YOUR NAME]
Date: [INSERT DATE]
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Re: NCP Manchester - Parked without payment
« Reply #4 on: »
Thanks a lot. I've now submitted the appeal as you suggested. When I send the complaint to the DVLA, do I need to attach the parking charge notice also? Sorry if it's a noob question. I just wanted to be sure

Re: NCP Manchester - Parked without payment
« Reply #5 on: »
Which bit of this sentence is not clear?

Quote
I have attached relevant supporting material with this statement. Please confirm receipt and provide a reference for this complaint.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain