Author Topic: “ Private” Smart Parking Court Claim Received – Retail Park Short Stay  (Read 101 times)

RichardW, Lolalux and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hi all,

I’m looking for advice after receiving what appears to be a County Court claim relating to a private parking charge (smart parking)from February 2023.
The vechile was parked at a retail park while quickly returning an item to one of the shops. The car park was almost completely empty at the time.

The driver genuinely believed there would be a short grace period allowed to enter, park, read any signs, and briefly use the shops. I now understand the car park tariff was around 40p for an hour and, in hindsight, the driver should probably have paid it. However, I was only there very briefly and the alleged stay was around 20 minutes in total.

A Parking Charge Notice was later issued for around Ł80. I ignored the later debt letters and no longer have most of them.

I have now received HMCTS / County Court paperwork and I’m unsure whether this is worth defending or whether I should settle it.

My main concerns are:

the stay was very short,

the car park was/ is always largely empty,

I do not recall seeing clear signage,

and the charge feels disproportionate given the parking tariff was only around 40p.


Any advice on next steps would be appreciated.

Image IMG 1273 hosted on ImgBB
ImgBB · ibb.co

Image IMG 1274 hosted on ImgBB
ImgBB · ibb.co

Image IMG 1275 hosted on ImgBB
ImgBB · ibb.co

Image IMG 1276 hosted on ImgBB
ImgBB · ibb.co

Image IMG 1277 hosted on ImgBB
ImgBB · ibb.co

https://ibb.co/yTFFdgX
https://ibb.co/dsQd0b6c
« Last Edit: May 16, 2026, 04:14:35 pm by Lolalux »

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


There is a “consideration period”. But not to allow you to park for free. 5 or 10 minutes in any case.

What did the PCN from Smart say?

If you don’t have it, get it, eg through a Subject Access Request as a matter of urgency.

Get pictures of the signs also if you think they are inadequate.
« Last Edit: May 16, 2026, 02:38:26 pm by jfollows »

I have just emailed smart parking for this.

I’m unsure about signage now. It’s been a while since I’ve parked there and I would have have guessed after 3 years it would be updated/ changed

Quick update:

I have now received the SAR from Smart Parking.

The ANPR images show:

* Entry: 12:07:51
* Exit: 12:25:43

So the total time on site was around 17 minutes.

I have attached:

* the original 2023 Smart Parking signage/T&Cs from the SAR,
* the PCN timings,
* and current photos of the car park layout/signage taken this week.

The site now appears to use different signage/operator branding (“Hozah” / UK Parking Administration Ltd), so I appreciate the current signage may not exactly match the 2023 setup.

DCB Legal have also confirmed the claim is currently “on hold” while they review matters further with their client.

I would appreciate any thoughts on:

* adequacy/prominence of signage,
* grace/consideration periods,
* ANPR timing,
* and whether 17 minutes total stay is realistically defensible in these circumstances.


Also want to mention a huge thank you for your help.




Image IMG 1562 hosted on ImgBB
ImgBB · ibb.co

Image IMG 1563 hosted on ImgBB
ImgBB · ibb.co

Image IMG 1564 hosted on ImgBB
ImgBB · ibb.co

Image IMG 1565 hosted on ImgBB
ImgBB · ibb.co

Image IMG 1566 hosted on ImgBB
ImgBB · ibb.co

https://ibb.co/KjZ1cwfj
https://ibb.co/RG2yFhRL
https://ibb.co/ccY3CbVN
https://ibb.co/WWFBw3gX
« Last Edit: Today at 01:47:53 pm by Lolalux »

Nothing attached.
« Last Edit: Today at 01:46:33 pm by jfollows »

The original Notice to Keeper is out of time for keeper liability so should be easy to defend.

Can we assume that the vehicle driver has never been revealed to Smart Parking?

You have to file a defence or Acknowledgment of Service by 1 June
If you do the latter, your deadline for filing a defence becomes 15 June
As @InterCity125 has observed, if the driver has not been identified then the registered keeper can not be held liable because Smart has failed to meet the requirements of PoFA 2012, specifically by not sending the Notice to Keeper to arrive within 14 days.

If you’ve not already done so, file the AoS now, defend in full, no counterclaim.
« Last Edit: Today at 02:34:54 pm by jfollows »

Or you could (given how simple it is) just enter the defence now;


1. The Defendant denies the claim in its entirety and no debt is owed to the Claimant.

2. It is acknowledged that I was the Registered Keeper of the vehicle at the material time.

3. The Claimant is unable to identify the driver at the material time and there is no legal obligation for the vehicle keeper to provide this information to the Claimant and I will not be doing so under any circumstance.

4. The Claimant appears to be relying on Protection of Freedoms Act (PoFA) (2012) which allows them to transfer liability from the unknown driver to the Registered Keeper but ONLY when the strict requirements of the legislation are met.

5. That, in this instance, the Claimant is unable to meet the requirements of PoFA as the Claimant's Notice to Keeper (NtK) was not delivered to the Registered Keeper within the statutory timeframe of 14 days from the date of the alleged parking event.

6. That the Claimant's issued NtK shows that the alleged parking event took place on 7th February 2023 but the notice was not even issued until 23rd February 2023 - this is very obviously beyond the 14 day period.

7. That with the Claimant unable to either identify the driver or rely on PoFA there is no legal route to liability in this matter.
« Last Edit: Today at 03:37:25 pm by InterCity125 »