Author Topic: Moorside Legal LoC Foreign Road Toll (EPC)  (Read 1490 times)

0 Members and 800 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Moorside Legal LoC Foreign Road Toll (EPC)
« Reply #15 on: »
Hi all,

Here is the reply from DVLA

Email: DataProtection.Policy@dvla.gov.uk
Date: 29th April 2025
Dear xxxxx,
Thank you for your email regarding the release of information from the Driver and Vehicle
Licensing Agency’s (DVLA) vehicle register to Euro Parking Collections PLC (EPC).
I can assure you that the DVLA takes the protection and security of the information it
holds very seriously and has appropriate procedures in place to handle personal data in
line with the relevant data protection principles applying.
Regulation 27 of the Road Vehicles (Registration and Licensing) Regulations 2002 allows
vehicle keeper details to be disclosed to third parties who can demonstrate that they have
a reasonable cause to receive it. Where reasonable cause has been shown, we disclose
information on the condition that it will only be used for the purpose specified and that
the recipient will protect its confidentiality. Although reasonable cause is not defined in
legislation, the Government’s policy is clear. Requests should relate to the vehicle or its
use following incidents where there may be liability on the part of the driver.
Drivers choosing to use toll roads do so subject to the terms and conditions applying.
The need to contact individuals who may not have complied with these conditions is
considered a reasonable cause.
There is no direct agreement between the UK and foreign authorities to share information
for this purpose. EPC is a customer of the DVLA’s Keeper at Date of Event (KADOE)
service and is subject to strict contractual terms. The data provided cannot be used for
any other purpose and may not be shared outside of the UK. Recipients of information
from DVLA records are audited regularly to ensure that information is only requested and
used in accordance with the contract terms.
A clear legal basis and appropriate safeguards apply to the disclosure of vehicle keeper
information for the purposes described.
EPC are a member of the BPA Approved Operator Scheme but this membership only
relates to requests made for parking in the UK, requests for toll roads is a separate issue
and ATA membership is not required in these circumstances.
You have queried why the SAR response you received made no reference to the fact
that the incident had occurred outside of the UK. Information relating to the location of
the toll road is not required to be provided when EPC submit requests. This is not
something that would be recorded by the DVLA. However, as explained above recipients
of DVLA data are audited regularly to help ensure that requests for data are justified and
that the information is used appropriately.
You have made reference to the Cross Border Enforcement Directive. This provides for
the exchange of vehicle keeper information to aid the recovery of financial penalties for
eight road traffic offences committed by non-resident offenders: They are as follows:
• Speeding
• Drink driving
• Non-use of a seat belt
• Failing to stop at a red traffic light
• Use of a forbidden lane
• Driving under the influence of drugs
• Failing to wear a safety helmet
• Using a mobile phone or any other communication devise whilst driving
Therefore, this does not apply in these circumstances
I hope you will appreciate that EPC’s compliance with the UK General Data Protection
Regulation (UK GDPR) and management of its contracts with third parties is not
something the DVLA can comment on.
Similarly, the way in which a foreign authority operates its schemes is a matter for them.
If you feel that you have been subject to an unfair penalty, you may wish to raise the
matter with EPC to seek advice on how best an appeal may be pursued.
I do hope this explains the position on this matter.
Yours sincerely
Sent unsigned via email

Re: Moorside Legal LoC Foreign Road Toll (EPC)
« Reply #16 on: »
Typical obfuscation and fob off by the DVLA. They are trying to avoid responsibility and whoever penned that response has not even bothered to identify themselves, most likely because they know they are out of order.

1. DVLA confirms no UK-Hungary agreement exists

There is no direct agreement between the UK and foreign authorities to share information for this purpose.”

• This reinforces the position that no lawful gateway exists for the exchange of vehicle data relating to foreign tolls post-Brexit.

2. DVLA does not require EPC to declare the foreign nature of the toll

Information relating to the location of the toll road is not required to be provided when EPC submit requests.”

• This represents a regulatory weakness, not a defence. The DVLA is effectively allowing a UK company to access UK citizens' personal data without disclosing whether the incident occurred in a foreign jurisdiction, thereby undermining transparency and lawful purpose.

3. EPC’s BPA membership does not cover foreign toll road data

“BPA membership only relates to requests made for parking in the UK; requests for toll roads is a separate issue and ATA membership is not required in these circumstances.”

• This confirms EPC’s toll-related access operates outside the usual KADOE governance framework tied to the BPA or IPC. The protection offered by Code of Practice oversight is absent here, raising concerns over the lack of accountability.

4. DVLA cannot verify EPC’s GDPR compliance

EPC’s compliance with the UK GDPR ... is not something the DVLA can comment on.”

• While this is a standard disclaimer, it supports escalation to the ICO, who does have jurisdiction to investigate data misuse and processing without lawful basis.

You now escalate this to a Step 2 complaint to the Head of Complaints at the DVLA. The process is exactly the same as for your original complaint except the URL is https://contact.dvla.gov.uk/head-of-complaints.

For the text part of the complaint webform, use this:

Quote
I am escalating my complaint to Step 2 of the DVLA complaints process.

My complaint concerns the unlawful release of my personal data to Euro Parking Collection PLC for an alleged toll road contravention in Hungary.

The Stage 1 response received from the DVLA Data Protection Policy team on 29 April 2025 failed to address the core legal issues and factual concerns raised. The response was unsigned, with no named officer taking responsibility, which is particularly alarming given the gravity of the matter.

I have attached a fully detailed supporting statement, identifying multiple breaches of data protection law, the KADOE contract, and regulatory failings by the DVLA itself.

Please confirm receipt and provide a reference number for this Step 2 escalation.

Then you could upload the following as a PDF file for the formal complaint itself:

Quote
SUPPORTING STATEMENT – STEP 2 DVLA COMPLAINT

Subject: Release of Personal Data to Euro Parking Collection PLC – Misuse of Keeper Data and Failures of Governance

Background

This Step 2 escalation concerns the release of my personal vehicle keeper data by the DVLA to Euro Parking Collection PLC (EPC) on 6 December 2023, relating to an alleged unpaid toll on a Hungarian motorway.

The Stage 1 response issued by the DVLA on 29 April 2025 is wholly inadequate. It failed to address the core concerns about legality, transparency, proportionality, and data governance, and was notably unsigned, raising concerns over the integrity of the complaints handling process.

Grounds for Escalation

1. No Reasonable Cause for Data Disclosure

Legal Reference:

• Regulation 27(1)(e) of the Road Vehicles (Registration and Licensing) Regulations 2002;
• UK GDPR Article 6(1)(c) (processing necessary for legal obligation).

Explanation:

Regulation 27 requires that disclosure of vehicle keeper data is based on reasonable cause. In the absence of a direct agreement between the UK and Hungary for civil enforcement of toll road charges, no reasonable cause exists to permit the disclosure of keeper data for a Hungarian road toll alleged breach.

The DVLA’s admission that there is “no direct agreement” governing the sharing of data for toll enforcement outside the UK confirms that no lawful framework existed. Therefore, the release of my data was made without a valid lawful basis under the Regulation and without meeting the requirements of Article 6 of the UK GDPR.

2. Failure of Transparency – Breach of UK GDPR Article 5(1)(a)

Legal Reference:

• UK GDPR Article 5(1)(a): “Personal data shall be processed lawfully, fairly and in a transparent manner in relation to the data subject.”

Explanation:

The DVLA admitted that EPC is not required to disclose whether the alleged toll incident occurred within or outside the UK when submitting a data request. This absence of a mandatory jurisdictional declaration allows data to be obtained under misleading circumstances, preventing data subjects from understanding how and why their data is processed.

This practice is a direct breach of the transparency principle under Article 5(1)(a). Without knowledge of the foreign nature of the alleged event, data processing cannot be deemed fair or transparent.

3. Breach of Purpose Limitation – UK GDPR Article 5(1)(b)

Legal Reference:

• UK GDPR Article 5(1)(b): “Personal data shall be collected for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes and not further processed in a manner that is incompatible with those purposes.”

Explanation:

The DVLA released my data to EPC for the purpose of recovering a toll charge. However, EPC and Moorside Legal are now pursuing the matter as a private civil debt in the UK courts, reframing a foreign public law toll as a contractual claim.

This represents further processing for a purpose incompatible with the one originally specified when the data was obtained. Under UK GDPR, this is unlawful unless new consent or legal authority is obtained, neither of which has occurred.

4. No Effective Safeguards for Toll Data Requests – Regulatory Failure

References:

• Data Protection Act 2018 Section 71 (Data Protection by Design and Default);
• KADOE Contract Schedule 2 (Obligations on Recipients of Data).

Explanation:

Unlike BPA or IPC regulated parking operators, EPC’s toll-related requests are not governed by any Code of Practice oversight. Despite this, the DVLA continues to release personal data based solely on EPC’s self-certification, without verification or mandatory audit of the true nature of each toll request.

This absence of regulatory control breaches the DVLA’s obligations under DPA 2018 Section 71 to implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure, and be able to demonstrate, that processing is performed in accordance with the UK GDPR.

5. Procedural Irregularities in Complaints Handling – Serious Governance Concerns

References:

• DVLA Complaints Policy (Internal standards);
• Civil Service Code (Accountability and Integrity Principles).

Explanation:

The Stage 1 response was issued without any named officer, contrary to standards of public sector accountability. In serious matters involving potential breaches of the law, unsigned responses without any officer identification violate basic governance norms and suggest either an intent to obscure accountability or a culture of evasion.

Given the public interest in lawful data processing by government bodies, this unexplained omission justifies serious concern and raises the appearance of maladministration or even a deliberate attempt to frustrate scrutiny.

Requested Outcomes

I request that the DVLA:

• Reassess the lawfulness of EPC’s KADOE request and the DVLA’s disclosure of my data in light of the absence of reasonable cause.
• Confirm whether EPC’s failure to declare the foreign nature of the toll incident constitutes material misrepresentation.
• Review and reform internal policies to require jurisdictional disclosure for all toll-related KADOE requests.
• Identify and disclose the named individual(s) responsible for the Stage 1 response.
• Investigate potential maladministration within the DVLA's complaints handling and governance process.
• Confirm what enforcement or disciplinary action will be taken if breaches are upheld.

Should this Step 2 complaint not be satisfactorily resolved, I will escalate the matter to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) and my Member of Parliament.

Name: [INSERT FULL NAME]
Date: [INSERT DATE]
Vehicle Registration: [REDACTED]
DVLA Reference (if applicable): [INSERT]

I also suggest you email your MP with the following request:

Quote
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]

[Email Address]

[Date]

[MP’s Name]
House of Commons
London
SW1A 0AA

Dear [MP’s Name],

Subject: Urgent Request to Raise Serious Failings by the DVLA Over the Release of Personal Data to an Unregulated Private Company

I am writing as your constituent to ask you to urgently raise a matter of serious public concern involving the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) and the unlawful release of my personal data.

On 6 December 2023, the DVLA released my vehicle keeper information to an unregulated private company, Euro Parking Collection PLC (EPC), in connection with an alleged unpaid road toll in Hungary.

There was no legal basis whatsoever for the DVLA to provide my data to this company:

• The alleged contravention occurred outside of the United Kingdom.
• There is no bilateral agreement between the UK and Hungary allowing such data exchanges for civil toll enforcement.
• EPC is not regulated for toll matters under any Approved Operator Scheme (such as the BPA or IPC).
• EPC was not required by the DVLA to disclose that the incident took place outside the UK.

The DVLA's own written response to my complaint (dated 29 April 2025) admits:

• They do not ask companies requesting data to specify whether the event occurred outside the UK.
• They do not check or audit this basic information.
• There is no legal framework that permits such data releases for foreign toll contraventions.
• EPC's toll requests are unregulated and are not subject to any industry Code of Practice.

This means that an unregulated private company has been allowed to obtain and exploit my highly sensitive personal data based on a misleading and incomplete request, with the DVLA's full cooperation and without any lawful authority.

The DVLA's actions are an absolute betrayal of the trust placed in them by millions of vehicle owners.

It is abundantly clear from the response I received that the DVLA is more interested in preserving its income stream from private companies than protecting the rights of data subjects under the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018.

I am absolutely incensed that a government agency can behave with such disregard for legality, transparency, and accountability — and I believe you should be equally outraged.

In light of the above, I am asking you to take urgent action:

1. Submit a Written Parliamentary Question (WPQ) to the Secretary of State for Transport asking:

Why the DVLA releases personal keeper data for alleged contraventions occurring outside the UK;
• What lawful basis the DVLA relies upon for releasing such data in the absence of any international enforcement agreement;
• What measures will be introduced to stop unregulated private companies exploiting DVLA data for foreign toll enforcement.

2. Write directly to the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Minister responsible for DVLA) demanding:

• An explanation as to why the DVLA does not verify jurisdiction when releasing data;
• An explanation as to why unregulated companies are allowed access to sensitive personal data without oversight;
• Details of any action being taken to investigate this practice and prevent its continuation.

This is not a mere technical issue.

It is a serious systemic failure in data protection governance at the DVLA, affecting every single vehicle keeper in the UK.
Unless challenged, it risks setting a dangerous precedent where any private company — whether UK-based or foreign — can obtain, misuse and monetise UK citizens' personal data without any proper regulation or scrutiny.

I ask that you treat this matter with the utmost seriousness and urgency.

Please confirm whether you will raise these issues in Parliament and write to the responsible Minister, and keep me informed of any responses you receive.

Yours sincerely,

[Your Full Name]
[Your Constituency]
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Re: Moorside Legal LoC Foreign Road Toll (EPC)
« Reply #17 on: »
Hello  b789

Thank you once again for your response. I have sent the stage 2 complaint and also wrote to my MP.

Will keep you all updated.

Like Like x 1 View List

Re: Moorside Legal LoC Foreign Road Toll (EPC)
« Reply #18 on: »
Hi all,

Latest response from DVLA

No response from MP

Complaints Team (D11)
Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
Longview Road
Morriston
Swansea
SA6 7JL
Website: www.gov.uk/dvla
Our Ref:
Date: 4 June 2025
Dear Mr
Thank you for your email of 30th April 2025 regarding the release of information from the
Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency’s (DVLA) vehicle register to Euro Parking Collection
PLC (EPC). This is being answered as a step 2 complaint.
I can only reiterate the advice previously provided in the DVLA letter dated 29th April 2025,
that Regulation 27(1)(e) of the Road Vehicles (Registration and Licensing) Regulations
2002 allows vehicle keeper details to be disclosed to third parties who can demonstrate that
they have a reasonable cause to receive it.
The need to contact drivers who have chosen to use toll roads abroad and may not have
complied with the terms and conditions applying is considered a reasonable cause.
Information is provided to EPC to seek recovery of unpaid road or bridge toll charges on
behalf of non-UK Central and Local Government organisations within the EU. EPC’s
operations are based in the UK. EU authorities pass evidence of contraventions, and the
registration marks of the vehicles involved to EPC who pursue the charges on behalf of
those organisations using vehicle keeper data from the DVLA. No DVLA data is passed to
the EU authorities.
EPC is a customer of the DVLA’s Keeper at Date of Event (KADOE) service and subject to
strict contractual terms, with the DVLA being aware of the reasons for each request for
information. Each permitted purpose for requesting registered keeper data from the DVLA
has a unique enquiry code which is provided by the requestor as part of the secure
electronic links used when the data is requested. Companies are only able to request
registered keeper data for the purposes outlined within their KADOE contract with the
DVLA.
Recipients of DVLA data are audited regularly, to ensure that requests for data are justified
and that the information is used appropriately. A clear legal basis and appropriate
safeguards apply to the disclosure of vehicle keeper information for the purposes
described.
Additionally, the DVLA’s Privacy Policy advises vehicle keepers that their details may be
released in a number of lawful circumstances and there is a note to that effect on the
Vehicle Registration Certificate (V5C) (under the heading ‘Data Protection’). The note also
provides a link to the DVLA’s online privacy policy which highlights the information about
who DVLA shares vehicle keeper information with. For ease of reference, the Privacy Policy
can be found here: http://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dvla-privacy-policy
I do hope this explains the position on this matter. You also have the right to complain to
the ICO if you believe that the DVLA has not handled your data appropriately. Further
information on how to raise a complaint with the ICO may be found at the following link:
Make a complaint | ICO.
Yours sincerely
Mrs N Smith
DVLA Complaints Team
Find out about DVLA’s online services



[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
« Last Edit: June 04, 2025, 04:38:41 pm by Basil_Brush »

Re: Moorside Legal LoC Foreign Road Toll (EPC)
« Reply #19 on: »
The DVLA’s Step 2 response is a strategic deflection, riddled with contradictions and legally questionable assertions. It fails to engage with the central points and doubles down on a justification that does not withstand legal scrutiny.

This now warrants:

• Escalation to the ICO, citing data misuse and lack of lawful basis under UK GDPR.
• A renewed and stronger approach to your MP, stressing that the DVLA has now admitted it is releasing personal data to an unregulated private company acting as a proxy debt collector for foreign governments without any statutory basis or data-sharing agreement.
• A follow-up letter to Transport Ministers and possibly the Information Commissioner’s Office via your MP, due to the public interest implications.

Here is a draft ICO complaint:

Quote
Subject: Formal Complaint – DVLA Unlawful Disclosure of Personal Data to Euro Parking Collection PLC for Foreign Toll Enforcement

Dear ICO,

I am submitting a formal complaint against the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) for unlawfully disclosing my personal data to a private company, Euro Parking Collection PLC (EPC), in breach of UK data protection law.

Background

On 6 December 2023, the DVLA released my vehicle keeper data to EPC. The company claims this was in relation to a Hungarian road toll charge. The DVLA’s Step 2 complaint response (dated 4 June 2025, signed by Mrs N Smith) confirms that:

• EPC obtains DVLA data for the purpose of pursuing foreign toll charges;
• EPC is acting on behalf of non-UK authorities, primarily within the EU;
• EPC uses UK keeper data to pursue recovery within the UK, but no reciprocal enforcement arrangement exists;
• The DVLA does not disclose this to data subjects at the time of collection.

Why This Is Unlawful

1. No Lawful Basis Under UK GDPR


The DVLA relies on Regulation 27(1)(e) to justify disclosure. However, this regulation must be interpreted in accordance with UK GDPR Article 6. There is no lawful basis for releasing UK data for the enforcement of foreign public law toll penalties — especially when:

• There is no international agreement in place for such enforcement post-Brexit;
• The processing is not necessary for a legal obligation or a task carried out in the public interest (Art. 6(1)(c) or (e));
• The data is used by a private company with a commercial interest, not a competent authority.

2. Failure of Transparency and Fair Processing

Under Article 5(1)(a) and Article 13, data subjects must be informed:

• Who their data is being shared with;
• For what specific purpose;
• On what lawful basis;
• And whether foreign entities are involved.

The DVLA’s privacy policy does not disclose that keeper data may be shared with an unregulated private company to pursue foreign tolls on behalf of non-UK governments. This failure violates the transparency and fairness principles under UK GDPR.

3. Purpose Creep – Article 5(1)(b) Violation

Data was disclosed under the pretence of toll enforcement, but the actual use is commercial debt recovery through UK civil channels. This is not compatible with the purpose for which the data was obtained and constitutes unauthorised further processing.

4. Inadequate Safeguards for a High-Risk Processing Activity

This processing concerns:

• Sensitive personal data;
• Cross-border implications;
• Use by a non-regulated private entity;
• The threat of court action and damage to reputation/credit.

Despite this, the DVLA admits that:

• It does not require disclosure of the country where the toll occurred;
• It allows private actors to process this data without independent oversight;
• There is no Code of Practice or redress route for UK data subjects targeted by EPC.[/indent]

This fails the requirements under Article 24 (data controller responsibility) and Article 25 (data protection by design and default).

Requested Action by the ICO

I ask the ICO to:


1. Open a formal investigation into the DVLA’s release of keeper data to EPC for foreign toll enforcement.

2. Determine whether DVLA has breached:

• Articles 5(1)(a), 5(1)(b), 6(1), 13, 24 and 25 of UK GDPR;
• The fairness and lawfulness principles under the DPA 2018.

3. Require the DVLA to:

• Suspend all such data releases until a lawful framework is established;
• Update its privacy policy to explicitly disclose any processing of data for foreign enforcement;
• Review the KADOE system to prevent improper use of Regulation 27.
[/indent]

I attach the DVLA’s responses, copies of the EPC correspondence, and my Step 1 and Step 2 complaints.

Yours faithfully,

[Your Full Name]
[Email Address]
[Address]
[Vehicle Registration]

Here is a firm and direct follow-up email to your MP, written to get their attention and prompt action — especially given their silence so far.

Quote
Subject: URGENT – DVLA Admits Releasing My Data to Private Company Acting for Foreign Governments Without Legal Basis

Dear [MP’s Name],

I am following up on my earlier letter concerning the DVLA’s unlawful disclosure of my personal data to Euro Parking Collection PLC (EPC) in connection with a Hungarian road toll.

I have now received the DVLA’s Step 2 response (dated 4 June 2025), and what it confirms is frankly staggering:

• The DVLA has admitted that it released my personal keeper data to a private UK company (EPC) which is acting on behalf of foreign governments to recover public law toll penalties issued outside the UK.
• There is no international agreement or legal treaty authorising this data exchange.
• The DVLA does not require EPC to disclose that these alleged contraventions occurred outside the UK.
• EPC is not subject to any regulatory oversight, and the DVLA is knowingly passing sensitive personal data to them anyway.

This is an extraordinary failure of data governance. There is no lawful basis under the UK GDPR or Regulation 27 for releasing personal data for foreign statutory enforcement, especially via an unregulated commercial intermediary. The DVLA’s excuses are evasive and transparently designed to protect its revenue stream from companies like EPC.

The complaint response, although signed only by “Mrs N Smith, DVLA Complaints Team”, fails to engage with any of the legal or regulatory issues I raised. It reads like a boilerplate deflection and raises serious concerns about whether anyone at the DVLA is willing to take personal or departmental responsibility for this unlawful practice.

At this point, I must ask:

Why has there been no response from you? You are my elected representative. The DVLA is abusing its powers, and no UK citizen should be vulnerable to the misuse of their personal data in this way.

I am now urgently asking you to:

1. Raise a formal Written Parliamentary Question (WPQ) asking:

• Why the DVLA releases UK citizens’ data to private UK-based companies acting on behalf of foreign governments;
• What lawful basis justifies this under UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018;
• Whether Ministers are aware that DVLA’s actions fall entirely outside the current UK-EU enforcement framework.

2. Write directly to the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport, demanding answers on:

• What steps will be taken to immediately suspend these data releases;
• How many UK citizens’ data has been released in this way;
• What redress and protections will be put in place for those affected.

The DVLA is a public body acting without proper oversight, regulation, or lawful authority. This goes far beyond a personal grievance — it is a systemic failure that exposes every UK vehicle keeper to abuse of their data for foreign enforcement purposes, with no legal process and no remedy.

Please confirm that you will act on this immediately.

Yours sincerely,

[Your Full Name]
[Your Constituency]
[Your Email Address]
[Your Vehicle Registration (if included previously)]

The Transport Select Committee scrutinises the Department for Transport and its agencies (including DVLA). You should send the following email because it can:

• Call witnesses,
• Investigate systemic abuse or maladministration,
• Make recommendations to Ministers.

Your complaint concerns DVLA's systemic misuse of keeper data, bypassing GDPR safeguards, enabling unregulated foreign debt enforcement via UK channels, and failing to be transparent with the public. That falls squarely within the Committee’s remit.

Send it to transcom@parliament.uk and also CC in yourself:

Quote
Subject: Request for Inquiry into DVLA’s Release of Personal Data to Private Company Acting for Foreign Governments

Dear Committee Clerk,

I am writing to ask the Transport Select Committee to investigate serious concerns involving the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) and the release of UK vehicle keeper data to a private company, Euro Parking Collection PLC (EPC).

The DVLA has confirmed, in writing, that it releases personal data to EPC, which is:

• A UK-registered private company,
• Acting on behalf of foreign governments, predominantly within the EU,
• Pursuing foreign tolls and traffic penalties against UK vehicle keepers,
• Operating entirely outside of any statutory framework or reciprocal agreement post-Brexit.

The DVLA admits that:

• It does not verify jurisdiction when releasing data;
• It allows EPC to request and use this data via the KADOE system;
• The data is used to pursue foreign public law penalties in UK civil courts;
• EPC is not regulated under any Approved Operator Scheme for these activities.

This raises extremely serious questions about:

• The legality of DVLA’s interpretation of “reasonable cause” under Regulation 27;
• The lawfulness of the processing under the UK GDPR and DPA 2018;
• The DVLA’s failure to disclose these practices in its Privacy Policy;
• The use of UK citizens’ data by foreign authorities via private proxies, with no oversight, redress, or accountability.

I have followed the DVLA’s internal complaints process and received a Stage 2 response that fails to justify this practice on any legal or regulatory basis.

This is a matter of national significance affecting millions of UK vehicle owners, and I believe a formal inquiry by the Committee is urgently warranted.

Please confirm whether the Committee will consider this matter for investigation. I would be happy to provide the correspondence trail and further evidence if requested.

Yours faithfully,

[Your Full Name]
[Your Constituency]
[Email Address]

You can also lobby the national media and let them know you are dealing with:

• DVLA releasing personal data to unregulated private company,
• For the benefit of foreign governments,
• To be used in UK debt recovery without lawful authority.

This has strong national media appeal — it’s a data protection scandal with real-world financial consequences.

You could email the following publication and media outlets:

The Guardian   Investigations/Data rights   data@theguardian.com
The Times   Consumer affairs           money@thetimes.co.uk
The Telegraph   Personal finance           personalfinance@telegraph.co.uk
BBC Newsnight   Investigative journalism   newsnight@bbc.co.uk
ITV Tonight   Investigations                   tonight@itv.com

Here is a suggested template to use to send to the relevant journalist or investigations desk:

Quote
Subject: DVLA Sharing UK Citizens’ Personal Data with Private Firm Acting for Foreign Governments

Dear [Journalist’s Name or Investigations Editor],

I am contacting you with a story of public interest involving the DVLA, the UK’s vehicle licensing authority, and a private company called Euro Parking Collection PLC (EPC).

The DVLA has confirmed in writing that it releases personal keeper data to EPC, which operates on behalf of foreign governments (including in the EU), to enforce alleged foreign road tolls and traffic fines — even though:

• No data-sharing agreement exists post-Brexit;
• The events occur outside UK jurisdiction;
• The company is not regulated and bypasses the usual Codes of Practice;
• UK citizens are being pursued for foreign fines as if they are private debts in civil courts.

The DVLA allows this through a loophole in its “KADOE” access scheme, without any legal gateway or transparency, and is knowingly passing data to a private enforcement proxy.

This has happened to me personally — I have the documents, DVLA admissions, and complaint trail to prove it. I believe this scandal needs exposure.

I’d be happy to provide the full paper trail and speak further if you’re interested in investigating this.

Yours sincerely,

[Your Full Name]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number (if comfortable)]
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Re: Moorside Legal LoC Foreign Road Toll (EPC)
« Reply #20 on: »
Hello b789

Thank you for your detailed responses. I will action them. Very much appreciated.

Regards

Basil Brush

Re: Moorside Legal LoC Foreign Road Toll (EPC)
« Reply #21 on: »
Just for the record as my original post did not show.. The DVLA request was 08/05/2024 and date of event was 06/12/2023

I do change these dates in the drafted letters.

Regards

Basil_Brush

Like Like x 1 View List