Author Topic: PCN for Leaving site at Central Six Coventry  (Read 560 times)

0 Members and 86 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: PCN for Leaving site at Central Six Coventry
« Reply #15 on: »
There is absolutely no evidence of the driver or anyone else for that matter, having left the site. Irrespective of whether the appeal is from the Keeper or the driver, this will never get as far as a hearing.

The onus is on the creditor to prove that the driver breached a term or condition of parking. Do not do their job for them. Unless that can evidence that the driver left the site, they cannot possibly win.

It is a pity that you identified as the driver when you could simply have appealed as the Keeper and declined to identify the driver, therefore requiring G24 to figure out, assuming they even had any evidential photos of someone actually leaving the "site", of who that person actually is.

Don't bother with an IAS appeal. Simply wait until you receive a Letter of Claim (LoC). You can safely ignore all debt recovery letters. They are powerless to actually do anything. Simply ignore anything except an LoC or a an actual N1SDT Claim Form from the CNCB.

If/when you do receive either of those two things, come back and show us. In the meantime, just get on wit your life and stop worrying about this. You won't be paying a penny to G24.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain
Agree Agree x 1 Love Love x 1 View List

Re: PCN for Leaving site at Central Six Coventry
« Reply #16 on: »
Hello everyone, When I appealed for the third time, they gave up.

Quote
Dear XXX

RE: Contractual Parking Charge Notice XXXXXX

Regarding the above Contractual Parking Charge Notice, we would like to confirm that this has been waived.

No further action is required by you.


I found that simply focusing on requesting evidence without saying too much makes them back off.

Here is my appeal content:

Quote
No Evidence of a Breach:

The evidence you provided—two photographs of my vehicle in a parking bay—does not demonstrate that I left the site. These images merely show my vehicle’s presence at the location, not my actions as the driver. Under the British Parking Association (BPA) or International Parking Community (IPC) Code of Practice, you must provide clear and specific evidence (e.g., video footage or photographs of me leaving the premises) to substantiate the claim that I breached the terms by leaving the site. The photographs you supplied fail to meet this standard and are wholly insufficient to justify the charge.

The Notice shows the vehicle parked in a designated parking slot, and in a car park with a 3 hour allowance. The notice refers to 'parked and left site' as the term breached, yet there is no evidence to support this. Before I can consider your demands, can you please provide photographic evidence that the driver of the vehicle 'left site'in alleged contravention of your terms. 

Given the lack of evidence supporting your allegation and I deny leaving site, I insist that you cancel this PCN immediately. Should you reject this appeal, please provide any additional evidence you intend to rely upon. Be warned, however, that if you persist with this baseless charge, I look forward to meeting you in court, where I am confident your flimsy evidence will not withstand scrutiny. I expect your response within the timeframe outlined in your governing body’s Code of Practice.

I hope to help others who encounter the same situation.
Winner Winner x 1 View List