3. Parking eye PCN - overstay - Farmfoods brierley hill
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: Parking eye PCN - overstay - Farmfoods brierley hill  (Read 4430 times)

0 Members and 148 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Parking eye PCN - overstay - Farmfoods brierley hill
« Reply #30 on: »
Can’t upload the back page but section 8 references a judgment 4th Nov 2015, parking eye and Barry Beavis where his appeal was dismissed. If that page is crucial let me know and I’ll try again!
Logged
Re: Parking eye PCN - overstay - Farmfoods brierley hill
« Reply #31 on: »
Beavis is not important but there may be things on the rear which might be, we can’t guess.
Beavis allows operators like Parking Eye to invoice for payment under contract law, and that the concept of “no loss” is irrelevant. The liable party is the driver, but the liability can be transferred to the registered keeper if PoFA 2012 is complied with. You have said that this was not the case.
Logged
Re: Parking eye PCN - overstay - Farmfoods brierley hill
« Reply #32 on: »
It's worth noting that Parking Eye have now modified their NtK wording in an attempt to make it compliant.

Yours is the old version of the NtK - it can be argued that the change of wording was an admission that the previous notices were not compliant.

This is purely a Letter Before Claim.

It's just another attempt to make you pay.

They will issue a claim regardless and this is just part of the game.

Simply respond to the LBC saying that you are the keeper, that you refuse to identify the unknown driver, that the NtK is not PoFA compliant and, therefore you deny any liability for the alleged debt.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
« previous next »
  3. Parking eye PCN - overstay - Farmfoods brierley hill