Author Topic: Parking charge notice, 20-28 Cotland´s Road, Bournemouth countrywide parking: Failure to pay, 25 min  (Read 9753 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hi, thank you for your message.

Sorry for the lengthy reply, I have written below what they sent to me in text form since otherwise I would be anonymising a large file before uploading images, however if it would be more helpful to have the information in the original form I will go ahead and do that).

This is the response I received from CPM (it was sent to me 33 mins after my message requesting the data).

...................................................................................................

"We write in response to a Subject Access Request that we received on 28th August 2025.
 
As per your request, please find enclosed all of the personal data, photographic evidence, and correspondence that we hold on our secure systems.
 
You will also be aware that we have passed all of the information provided within this SAR to our Debt Recovery Agents and solicitors to pursue Parking Charge(s) that remain outstanding. We notify Drivers and Keepers of our intention to share your personal information on both our ‘Notice to Driver’ and ‘Notice to Keeper’ letters.
 
We have shared your data with the below third parties:
 
Trace Debt Recovery Ltd 2. BW Legal Ltd
             PO Box 1448  Enterprise House
             Northampton  1 Apex View
             NN2 1DW   Leeds
LS11 9BH
 
Please note, should you require SAR from the below parties, you must contact them directly to request this.
 
We will hold the enclosed information until any outstanding Parking Charge(s) in relation to the above vehicle have been settled.
 
If you have any further data-related requests or concerns, please contact us by either writing to us or emailing dp@countrywideparking.co.uk. Otherwise, we consider our duties in relation to your SAR to be met and you should now direct any further correspondence in relation to any outstanding Parking Charges to our solicitors, BW Legal Ltd.
 
Yours sincerely"

...................................................................................................

The additional information they added in a zip file was as follows:

"Generated on: 20/08/2025 09:36 AM
Enforcer :Countrywide Parking Management Ltd
PCN: CPM755149
[my name, address, tel no, email]
Type: Driver
Source: Appeal
VRM: [my number plate]
Make/ model/ colour (all correct)
Contravention date: 23/12/2024 16:56 PM
Site: 20-28 Cotland´s Road"

"CONTACT HISTORY
ID [a 6 digit number]
[my name, address]
Type: Keeper
Source: DVLA"

Then there are a series of photos of my vehicle entering the car park, leaving the car park - displaying my number plate.

Then there are a number of attachments, as follows:
1) An image of the ringo sign with location number and the terms and conditions
2) Final notice letter (12/05/2025) addressed to my previous address where I left on 30/04/2025. I submitted my application with my new address on 31/03/2025 for my new licence and V5C owner certificate, and received them both 2 weeks later, well before that letter from CPM was issued - is this something I could use to exploit against them?
3) The rejection reply to the appeal which I submitted, dated 11/02/2025
4) Another Image of the Ringo app location number and the terms and conditions
5) The appeal I submitted on 17/01/2025, which has a note: ´Driver was the elected choice´
6) Original notice to keeper dated 03/01/2025



That is all the information they provided. As far as I can make out then they did not provide the following, which was asked for:
a) ANPR Logs
b) Ringo/ payment look-ups and reconsolidating
c) Call/ portal logs
d) Internal notes
e) DVLA request/ response
f) site plan
g) contract/ policies relating to this site

Thank you in advance

what location is on the sign in the pic they supplied?
Quote from: andy_foster
Mick, you are a very, very bad man

Respond to the DPO with the following email (and CC yourself):

Quote
Subject: Incomplete SAR – You omitted BW Legal from the recipient list (PCN [ref], VRM [VRM])

Dear Data Protection Officer,

Your SAR response (received 28 August 2025) is not complete. You’ve failed to list BW Legal as a recipient of my personal data, even though you (and BW Legal) are actively using my data in live pre-action correspondence. That omission is blatant. It renders your disclosure inaccurate and incomplete under UK GDPR Articles 12 and 15.

Fix it. Here’s what you will provide, in full, within the statutory deadline (28 September 2025):

A complete disclosure/recipient log for this PCN showing all recipients — including BW Legal — with:

• identity of recipient;
• categories of personal data disclosed;
• date/time of each disclosure;
• purpose and lawful basis.

DVLA KADOE audit trail for this PCN: date/time of the single DVLA request, the address returned, and any subsequent address-verification/trace records that refer to me, especially before your Final Notice dated 12/05/2025 and before instructing solicitors.

The personal data you withheld despite my request:

• Full ANPR event log for my VRM for the material period (all reads/timestamps/camera IDs/retention entries).
• RingGo/payment look-ups and back-office records referencing my VRM/PCN (matching/mismatch notes for the material window).
• Internal notes, decision records, and portal/web-form audit logs referencing me/this PCN.
• Any data accuracy records explaining why you used my former address after my DVLA update in early April 2025.
• Your retention schedule as applied to my personal data for this PCN.

If you want to claim an exemption, name the specific exemption and explain how it applies to the precise item withheld. Do not fob me off with generic boilerplate.

You’ve already pushed my data to BW Legal, yet pretended otherwise in your SAR pack. That is unacceptable. If you do not correct this and supply the missing data by 28 September 2025, I will file an ICO complaint for failure to comply with Articles 12/15 and for data accuracy breaches (Art. 5(1)(d)). I will include your contradictory disclosures and timeline.

Acknowledge receipt today. Send the corrected SAR output to this email and use my current postal address below for all future correspondence.

[Full name]

[Current postal address]
[Email]
PCN: [ref]
VRM: [VRM]
« Last Edit: September 24, 2025, 11:14:59 am by b789 »
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Send the following to BW Legal. You may have to use their portal, in which case just upload it as a pdf letter:

Quote
Subject: Countrywide Parking Management Ltd v [Your Name] – Your ref [BW ref] – PAPDC disclosure + Article 14 request

Dear Sirs,

I dispute the alleged debt. This matter is not ready for litigation. Please place it on hold for 30 days and provide the documents and information below so the issues can be narrowed, per the Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims (PAPDC).

Core documents needed (PAPDC):

a) Signage pack and site plan for 20–28 Cotlands Road (as at 23/12/2024), including entrance and terms signage and installation/inspection dates.
b) Proof of landowner authority/contract showing Countrywide Parking Management Ltd’s standing (parties, dates, term, the right to issue and to litigate—commercial rates may be redacted).
c) RingGo integration/payment reconciliation for the material period, including location codes for all adjacent/related sites (Cotlands Road; Cotlands Road Overflow; 20–28 Cotlands Road), any change logs, and reconciliation for my VRM/time window to evidence payment/misdirected payment.
d) Your client’s consideration/grace-period policy in force on the material date.
e) The particulars your client relies on to justify any sum beyond the headline charge. For the avoidance of doubt, the £70 add-on is denied as unrecoverable/double recovery; please confirm any claim will be limited to principal, court fee, and fixed legal costs only.

Address accuracy & service:

Your client sent a Final Notice dated 12/05/2025 to my previous address despite my DVLA updates being effective well before that date. Confirm in writing that all correspondence and any proceedings will be served only at my current address below. Any attempt to serve elsewhere will be opposed as unreasonable and contrary to PAPDC.

Your data handling (UK GDPR Article 14):

Please confirm, for this file:

• the source of my personal data (controller identity and the date first received from your client);
• categories of personal data processed;
• purposes and lawful bases;
• recipients or categories of recipients to whom you have disclosed my data;
• your retention period for this matter.

SAR inconsistency (for the record):

Your client’s SAR output failed to list BW Legal as a recipient of my data, despite your active use of it. I have required your client to correct this and produce a full disclosure log (recipients, dates, purposes, lawful bases). Please ensure your disclosure to me aligns with the corrected log.

Until you provide the above, I am unable to complete the PAPDC Standard Financial Statement or respond on liability/quantum beyond the dispute already stated.

Yours faithfully,

[Full name]

[Current postal address]
[Email]
PCN: [ref]
VRM: [VRM]
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

I will send that letter to BW Legal, thank you once again for your time and effort in providing the framework to combat this.

Regarding the letter to CPM. In their email they did state the following (which I have copied and pasted):


“ We have shared your data with the below third parties:
 
Trace Debt Recovery Ltd 2. BW Legal Ltd
             PO Box 1448  Enterprise House
             Northampton  1 Apex View
             NN2 1DW   Leeds
LS11 9BH ”


Before I send the reply to CPM, it appears however from the extract that they have listed BW Legal as a recipient of my personal data. Am I mistaken?

Thank you once again.

In which case just remove the bit about failing to show that BW Legal were given your data.

It really would help us if people at least tried to format what they are trying to show us.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Apologies with the formatting, when I hear a response I shall endeavour to format post in a clearer way.

I have sent the amended email to CPM. Regarding the BW Legal one, should I wait until I have a response from the previous correspondence I sent to them, before sending the one you have posted above, or just send it in addition before hearing back from them. (It’s been 30 days today since I sent the last correspondence to them and have not yet heard back).

Thank you

Just send the email/letter to BW Legal. They are acting on behalf of their client so you do not communicate with CPM from nw on, except to wait for the response to your SAR. If they do not respond to the SAR within 30 days, you report them tot he ICO.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Good morning.

I tried to send the message to BW legal, however their online portal is not working. I then tried to start a live chat and they send an automatic response saying that they’re having technical difficulty so cannot reply. Therefore the only option is to phone them. I’d prefer not to do that way since it’s not written down as evidence.

Also it’s been now over 30 days since I sent the previous letter to BW legal. I have not had a response from them.

Thanks

Send the following letter by post, and include the letter you originally attempted to send. Send it first class and get a free certificate of posting from any post office. You do not have to use signed for/recorded delivery. A certificate of posting is enough to prove deemed delivery.

Quote
[Your full name]
[Your full postal address]
[Your email address]

[Date]

BW Legal
[Their postal address]

Your ref: [XXXX]

FORMAL CHASER & COMPLAINT – PAPDC NON-ENGAGEMENT/REFUSAL TO USE PORTAL

Dear Sirs,

I wrote to you on [insert date]. Over 30 days have elapsed with no substantive response.

Your online portal has been unreliable and live chat returns “technical difficulty” messages. From now on, I will not use any portal. Communication must be in writing by email or post only.

Please confirm a working email address for this matter within 14 days. Failing that, correspondence will proceed by post.

Any postal correspondence you send will be rebuttable on presumption of delivery unless you can evidence proof of posting (e.g. Certificate of Posting or tracked service). It is therefore in your interest to use email where possible.

Please treat this as:
(a) A chaser for a substantive response to my letter of [date] (copy enclosed); and
(b) A formal complaint regarding your failure to engage and to provide a functioning written channel, contrary to the Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims (PAPDC).

For the avoidance of doubt, my address for service is:
[Insert full, correct address including building and flat numbers].

If your records differ, rectify them immediately and confirm erasure of any incorrect address data.

Do not commence proceedings until you have provided a PAPDC-compliant, point-by-point response to my letter of [date]. Should you issue regardless, I will rely on this correspondence on costs for unreasonable conduct.

Please reply within 14 days with:
• Your substantive response to the [date] letter; and
• Confirmation of the correct email and postal channels you will use going forward.

Yours faithfully,

[full name]

Enclosures:
• Copy letter dated [date]
• Screenshots: portal/live-chat failures (if available)
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Thank you, I have sent the letter as you have advised. I did take screenshots so have also included those. I will post again when I have got a response. Thank you once again.

Good evening,

I have received an email from CPM which I believe includes some possible serious leverage in my favour. (I have not yet heard back from BW Legal since I sent the letter to them on 3rd October, and also from my previous portal submitted letter previously on 28th August)

Interestingly it seems CPM have given my data away 'inadvertently' or as the describe it

an ″incident in which personal data relating to you was inadvertently disclosed to an unauthorised individual″.

I do note that they did not inform me of this on any earlier occasion, only after the previous email you advised me to send advising them they have not correctly completed the SAR.

Below is a copy and paste of their email,

..............................................................................................

″Subject: Re: Subject Access Request (SAR)
 
Dear Mr [xxx],
 
We acknowledge receipt of your correspondence.
 
Following a comprehensive review, we confirm that all personal data currently held by Countrywide Parking Management in relation to you and the referenced Parking Charge Notice has been disclosed in full, up to and including today’s date.
 
For your reference, we have attached the RingGo receipts that were submitted with your original appeal, along with a copy of the letter that was generated on 29/08/25.
 
Please note that our records are maintained in accordance with our data retention policy and statutory obligations. Certain categories of information are retained for a fixed period and are securely purged once that period has expired. As such, data that has been lawfully deleted in line with our retention schedule would no longer be available for disclosure.
 
Having reviewed this matter in full, we are satisfied that we have met all of our obligations and commitments under data protection legislation, and therefore, we are unable to provide any further assistance on this matter.
 
For the avoidance of doubt, you retain the right to raise any concerns with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).
 
We remain committed to ensuring full compliance with all obligations under the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018.
 
Kind regards,
Administration Team
Countrywide Parking Management Ltd″


..............................................................................................

Please find their data breach letter below which they included as an attachment on their latest email. The email was dated 13th October, the data breach was from 29th August. They never sent the letter to me electronically or to my new address, where other threatening letters from BW Legal have been arriving successfully.

..............................................................................................


″29th August 2025

Issue date: 03/01/2025

I am writing to inform you of an incident in which personal data relating to you was inadvertently disclosed to an unauthorised individual.
On 28th August 2025, as part of a Subject Access Request process, we mistakenly shared your personal data, which included your full name, address, contact number and email address, with another individual. The error was identified on 29th August 2025, and we took immediate steps to request the return and secure deletion of the data.

We want to assure you that:
The error was a genuine administrative mistake and not the result of malicious activity.
We have contacted the unintended recipient, who has confirmed that they have deleted the information and will not retain or use it.
We have reported this breach in line with our obligations under the UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018.

We recognise the seriousness of this incident and sincerely apologise for the distress this may cause. We have taken the following steps to prevent this from happening again:
Additional staff training on handling Subject Access Requests.

Implementing extra checks to ensure responses are only sent to the correct individual.
If you have any concerns about this matter, please do not hesitate to contact our Data Protection Officer at [insert contact email/phone number]. You also have the right to raise a complaint with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) should you wish to do so: www.ico.org.uk.

Once again, we apologise for this error and thank you for your understanding.

Yours sincerely,
Benita Excel
Data Protection Officer
Countrywide Parking Management Ltd″

..............................................................................................

P.s. I tried to include the attachments on imager as usual but it seems to have been 'blocked' in the U.K. hence why I copied and pasted it.

Thank you in advance.




You have some good leverage there. First, send the following email to Countrywide's DPO and CC yourself:

Quote
Subject: Personal data breach & incomplete SAR – PCN [ref], VRM [VRM] – ICO escalation if not rectified in 7 days

Dear Data Protection Officer,

I acknowledge your email of 13 October 2025 and the attached breach letter dated 29 August 2025.

Personal data breach
You admit there was “an incident in which personal data relating to you was inadvertently disclosed to an unauthorised individual” on 28 August 2025, identified 29 August 2025. You did not notify me until 13 October 2025. That is not “without undue delay” as required by UK GDPR Article 34. The breach also indicates failures under Article 5(1)(f) and Article 32 (integrity/confidentiality and security of processing).

You also omitted BW Legal from the recipient list in your SAR output, despite you and BW Legal actively processing my data. That renders the SAR incomplete and inaccurate (Articles 12 and 15(1)(c)) and undermines your claim that you had “disclosed in full”.

Accordingly, within 7 days please provide:
1. ICO breach report evidence: date/time you notified the ICO; ICO case/reference number; and a copy of the report/online submission (or your full narrative if by phone).
2. Breach particulars (Art. 34 content requirements):
• nature of the breach; precise data items disclosed;
• likelihood and severity of risk to me;
• steps taken by you;
• specific advice to me to mitigate adverse effects;
• the identity and contact details of your DPO.

2. Recipient/disclosure log (corrected): a complete log for this PCN showing all recipients (including BW Legal): identity, categories of data shared, and date/time of each disclosure; the log entry for the unauthorised recipient; and evidence of your “return/deletion” request and confirmation.
4. Incomplete SAR – missing personal data:
• Full ANPR event log for my VRM for the material period (all reads/timestamps/camera IDs/retention entries).
• RingGo/payment back-office records that reference my VRM/this PCN, including matching/mismatch notes for the material window.
• Internal notes, decision records, and portal/web-form audit logs referencing me/this PCN.
• DVLA KADOE request/response (single request date/time and address returned) and any address-verification/trace records referencing me, particularly before your Final Notice of 12/05/2025 and before instructing solicitors.
• Any data accuracy records explaining continued use of my former address after my DVLA update in early April 2025.

5. Retention schedule & deletion evidence: You asserted data may have been “lawfully deleted”. Provide your retention policy as it applies to my data for this PCN and deletion logs for any items you say are no longer held.

If you claim any exemption, identify the specific exemption and explain how it applies to the particular item withheld.

Unless the above is supplied within 7 days, I will file a complaint with the ICO for (i) failure to comply with Articles 12/15, (ii) breach notification failures under Article 34, and (iii) integrity/confidentiality/security failures under Articles 5(1)(f)/32. I also reserve my rights to seek compensation under Article 82 UK GDPR and s.168 DPA 2018 for distress arising from this breach and your non-compliance.

Acknowledge receipt today. All future correspondence must use my current postal address below.

Yours faithfully,

[Full name]
[Current postal address]
[Email]
PCN: [ref] | VRM: [VRM]
Second, send the following to BW Legal and CC yourself:

Quote
Subject: Your ref [BW ref] – Put on hold – Controller breach & data accuracy; Article 14 info required

Dear Sirs,

I dispute the alleged debt. The matter is not ready for litigation.

On 13 October 2025 Countrywide Parking Management (CPM) disclosed to me that on 28 August 2025 they inadvertently disclosed my personal data to an unauthorised individual during a SAR process and only identified it on 29 August 2025. They failed to notify me until 13 October 2025. Their SAR output also omitted BW Legal as a recipient, despite your active use of my data. I have demanded their corrected recipient/disclosure log (including the dates they disclosed my data to you) and their ICO breach report reference.

Given the controller’s admitted breach and SAR inaccuracies, please:
1. Place the matter on hold for 30 days and confirm you will not process further nor issue proceedings until CPM has completed corrective steps and provided the missing disclosure materials.
2. Provide your Article 14 information for this file:
• source of my data and the date first received from CPM;
• categories of personal data processed;
• purposes and lawful bases;
• recipients or categories of recipients;
• retention period for this file.

3. Confirm that all correspondence and any proceedings will be served only at my current address below.

My outstanding PAPDC requests also remain: signage pack/site plan as at 23/12/2024; proof of landowner authority; RingGo integration/payment reconciliation for the material period (including adjacent sites’ codes and change logs); consideration/grace-period policy; and particulars for any sum beyond the principal (the £70 add-on is denied as unrecoverable).

Yours faithfully,

[Full name]
[Current postal address]
[Email]
PCN: [ref] | VRM: [VRM]
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Thank you I will send this today.

Regarding the incomplete SAR, as mentioned previously they did include BW Legal in their emailed response on 28th August. Should I therefore remove that part of your responses that references that?

If so, should I still however maintain that their SAR still incomplete with regards to articles 12 and 15)(1)(c) because of the following omissions?:


4. Incomplete SAR – missing personal data:
• Full ANPR event log for my VRM for the material period (all reads/timestamps/camera IDs/retention entries).
• RingGo/payment back-office records that reference my VRM/this PCN, including matching/mismatch notes for the material window.
• Internal notes, decision records, and portal/web-form audit logs referencing me/this PCN.
• DVLA KADOE request/response (single request date/time and address returned) and any address-verification/trace records referencing me, particularly before your Final Notice of 12/05/2025 and before instructing solicitors.
• Any data accuracy records explaining continued use of my former address after my DVLA update in early April 2025.

To clarify one point regarding the above, they did not include the dates and times they sent my data to BW Legal in the document bundle they attached via email, they just stated the fact that they did disclosed to BW Legal in the body off their email reply. There was no date or time associated with that statement however