Author Topic: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops  (Read 4510 times)

0 Members and 380 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
« Reply #60 on: »
Hi this case seems to be progressing along. I sent Gladstones the letter as advised and this was their reply in October which was basically irrelevant, just confirming they only had one address for our contact.


VIA EMAIL ONLY

Our Reference:
30th October 2024

Dear Mrs

Request for Erasure of Personal Data

We write in response to your request for Erasure of Data, specifically relating to erasing any older address than the address shown below.

For completeness, our Firm hold only the below address for you;
Therefore, the request for Erasure is not applicable in these circumstances.
Other Queries

Please note the remainder of your correspondence will be addressed by the Legal Department in due course, please be assured that the matter will remain on hold until then.

Yours sincerely

The Compliance Department
Gladstones Solicitors Limited

'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Today we received a new email from Gladstones stating the following. We are now looking for advice on how to tackle this...........................


10 number deleted.10 / 31 / Premier Parking Enforcement Ltd -v- deleted
Dear Mrs ,
   
We write further to your correspondence dated the 26th Oct er 2024.
 
May we take the opportunity to thank you for your patience whilst awaiting a response. 
   
The Amount Due/ Debt includes £70.00 claimed by our Client for the time/resources spent facilitating the recovery of the unpaid parking charge notice(s) pursuant to its ATA’s Code of Practice and the Terms and Conditions of the Contract, which was entered into upon the driver of the vehicle entering the Relevant Land. The amount is a pre-determined and nominal contribution to our Client’s losses as a direct result of your non-payment.
   
As our Client is satisfied the charge was issued correctly, we invite you to make payment in full to the bank account detailed below, quoting reference 10.1.
   
Gladstones Solicitors Ltd 
Barclays Bank 
Account Number: 33028712 
Sort Code: 20-24-09 
   
The outstanding amount is £170.00.
 
Alternatively, you can make payment online at www.gladstonessolicitors.co.uk or via the automated payment line on 0333 0230 049 quoting your reference. 
 
Failure to make payment before the 25th February 2025 will result in legal proceedings being issued to recover the debt in full. 
   
Please note, we will not accept any further submissions from you. 
   
Kind regards, 

Skye 
Legal Assistant 
 
Gladstones Solicitors Limited 
Unit B 
1st Floor 
210 Cygnet Court 
Centre Park 
Warrington 
WA1 1PP 
 
w  : www.gladstonessolicitors.co.uk 
t    : 01565 755088 
e   : Skye@gladstonessolicitors.co.uk 


I notice they avoided answering the questions posed to them in the letter dated 26/10/24 as drafted by yourselves, ....  I notice they avoided answering the questions they were given re..... 1. Am I to understand that the additional £70 represents what you lot dress up as a 'Debt
Recovery' fee, and if so, is this nett or inclusive of VAT? If the latter, would you kindly explain
why I am being asked to pay the operator’s VAT?
2. With regard to the principal alleged PCN sum: Is this damages, or will it be pleaded as
consideration for parking? Can you advise on next move. Thank you for all your time and effort.




Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
« Reply #61 on: »
Typical of this firm of incompetent wannabe legals. The first thing is I report them to HMRC for suspected VAT fraud (in the £millions).

You can now either respond and repeat the questions they have not answered an darn them that their refusal to answer them is a breach of the PAP and will be used against them at any hearing, or you can just sit back and wait for for the N1SDT Claim Form to arrive from the CNCB.

the claim will contain Particulars of Claim (PoC) that fail to comply with CPR 16.4(1)(a) which is a serious breach of procedure and a defence with supporting persuasive case law will be made for the claim to be struck out for this breach.

You are thankfully dealing with a firm whose incompetence is embarrassing.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
« Reply #62 on: »
He I am, some 5 years since last sticking my nose into the seedy world PPCs, and one name that continues to astonish me as to their presence is Gladstones. Given the volumes of these invoices printed, someone, some where, must see that this is a huge abuse of process and the practice should be outlawed.

PS. The new board is a vast improvement on Pepipoo (RIP)

Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
« Reply #63 on: »
Typical of this firm of incompetent wannabe legals. The first thing is I report them to HMRC for suspected VAT fraud (in the £millions).

You can now either respond and repeat the questions they have not answered an darn them that their refusal to answer them is a breach of the PAP and will be used against them at any hearing, or you can just sit back and wait for for the N1SDT Claim Form to arrive from the CNCB.

the claim will contain Particulars of Claim (PoC) that fail to comply with CPR 16.4(1)(a) which is a serious breach of procedure and a defence with supporting persuasive case law will be made for the claim to be struck out for this breach.

You are thankfully dealing with a firm whose incompetence is embarrassing.

 I guess their "Please note, we will not accept any further submissions from you." comment means we just wait for their court papers to arrive. Thanks for your time and help on this matter.

Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
« Reply #64 on: »
Show us the N1SDT Claim Form when you receive it. Redact your persona info, the claim number and the MCOL password. Leave everything else, especially all dates and times visible.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain