Author Topic: ECP / DCBL - No Valid Payment - Weavers Wharf Kidderminster - No LBC yet  (Read 18 times)

0 Members and 92 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hi all, first post, looking for a sense check on where I stand before anything formal arrives.

THE BASICS
Parking company: Euro Car Parks
Location: Weavers Wharf, Kidderminster
Date of alleged contravention: August 2025
Site type: ANPR, reason given as "no valid payment or validation to cover duration of stay"
My position: I am the registered keeper. The vehicle was sold a few weeks after the alleged contravention date.

THE ISSUE
I never received the original Notice to Keeper. The first correspondence I was aware of was a letter from Debt Recovery Plus demanding £170. I believe the NTK may not have reached me due to the vehicle being sold shortly after the parking date.

CORRESPONDENCE TIMELINE
Step 1 - My initial contact via ECP website contact form
Upon receiving the DRP letter I submitted a message via ECP's website requesting a copy of the original notice, photos, and confirmation of the original charge amount. I cited PoFA 2012 and noted ECP remains the legal creditor.

Step 2 - ECP's response
ECP replied from a no-reply address stating they could not accept my correspondence as the matter had been passed to DRP, and that all communication must now go through them.

Step 3 - My formal email to ECP appeals address
As I could not reply to the no-reply address I forwarded the chain to the appeals email listed on their website at the time. In this email I confirmed I was not refusing payment, offered to settle at the original charge amount, cited Schedule 4 PoFA 2012 noting ECP remains legal creditor and DRP has no independent standing, requested ECP either accept direct payment or confirm they were not pursuing the matter, and noted I did not consent to further third party data processing under UK GDPR. ECP never replied.

Step 4 - Attempted further contact after DCBL letter arrived
When I later tried to chase via the appeals email I received an automated response stating that address is no longer in use, directing me to the website contact form. When I used the contact form I received an automated response saying the matter had been referred to DCBL and to speak to them. ECP have effectively closed off all direct communication routes.

DRP LETTERS
I have DRP chaser letters dated 3rd November, 18th November, 3rd December and 31st December. I do not have the original DRP letter or any correspondence before early November as some letters were lost during a house move. No formal Letter Before Claim was received at any point during the DRP correspondence period.

MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENT
After moving house I received my first ever letter from DCBL (Direct Collection Bailiffs Ltd) acting for ECP. The letter states £170 is owed, gives 14 days to pay or contact them, explicitly states it is NOT subject to High Court or bailiff action, and says they may recommend their client commence legal action.

WHERE I AM NOW
No LBC. No court claim. First DCBL letter only at this stage. I have copies of my ECP correspondence and the four DRP letters available if helpful. I did not appeal via POPLA as I was unaware of the charge until the DRP letter arrived, by which point that window had long passed.

MY QUESTIONS
Is the DCBL letter a standard pre-action step or does it indicate court action is genuinely closer?
Given the NTK was never received, is ECP's keeper liability position under PoFA 2012 weakened?
Should I respond to DCBL at all, or sit tight?
If a claim arrives, is £170 likely to be the enforceable amount or would a court reduce it?
Any known history of ECP/DCBL issuing claims for this site or at this value?
Given ECP have blocked all direct communication routes, does this strengthen my position at all?

Thanks in advance.









Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


The normal advice is that you should always ignore debt recovery companies, be they DCBL or Debt Recovery Plus or whoever.
Just note that DCB Legal is a different company and will shortly send you things like a Letter of Claim and raise a court claim.
In the meantime you should raise a Subject Acess Request to Euro Car Parks for all the information they hold on you, which will include the original parking notice.

ECP sending the original notice to the address recorded on the car’s V5C is a basic requirement. It is unlikely that ECP didn’t obtain this address, but seeing the original PCN will clarify this.

If there is any history for this site, you can search the forum for it.
« Last Edit: Today at 04:00:52 pm by jfollows »
Like Like x 1 View List

Appreciate the reply.

I’ve now sent a SAR via the ICO, mainly to force disclosure of the NTK, DVLA KADOE logs and full case history so I can confirm whether PoFA has been properly complied with.

From your experience, how likely is it at this stage that DCB Legal actually pick this up and issue a Letter of Claim?

Very likely.

I can pretty much guarantee you that the ECP issued NtK will not be PoFA compliant and that, in theory, should make this easy to defend and they will have no idea who the driver was.

But let's wait for the NtK to arrive to be sure.

ECP normally respond to SAR very quickly - probably because they see money - maybe they know that SAR requests normal lead to payment, who knows?